A hard disk drive (HDD)[note 1] is a data storage device used for storing and retrieving digital information using rapidly rotating disks (platters) coated with magnetic material. An HDD retains its data even when powered off. Data is read in a random-access manner, meaning individual blocks of data can be stored or retrieved in any order rather than sequentially. An HDD consists of one or more rigid ("hard") rapidly rotating disks (platters) with magnetic heads arranged on a moving actuator arm to read and write data to the surfaces.

Introduced by IBM in 1956,[1] HDDs became the dominant secondary storage device for general purpose computers by the early 1960s. Continuously improved, HDDs have maintained this position into the modern era of servers and personal computers. More than 200 companies have produced HDD units, though most current units are manufactured by Seagate, Toshiba and Western Digital. Worldwide revenues for HDD shipments are expected to reach $33 billion in 2013, a decrease of approximately 12% from $37.8 billion in 2012.

The primary characteristics of an HDD are its capacity and performance. Capacity is specified in unit prefixes corresponding to powers of Template:Notatypo: a 1-terabyte (TB) drive has a capacity of Template:Notatypo gigabytes (GB; where 1 gigabyte = Template:Notatypo bytes). Typically, some of an HDD's capacity is unavailable to the user because it is used by the file system and the computer operating system, and possibly inbuilt redundancy for error correction and recovery. Performance is specified by the time to move the heads to a file (Average Access Time) plus the time it takes for the file to move under its head (average latency, a function of the physical rotational speed in revolutions per minute) and the speed at which the file is transmitted (data rate).

The two most common form factors for modern HDDs are 3.5-inch in desktop computers and 2.5-inch in laptops. HDDs are connected to systems by standard interface cables such as SATA (Serial ATA), USB or SAS (Serial attached SCSI) cables.

Template:As of, the primary competing technology for secondary storage is flash memory in the form of solid-state drives (SSDs). HDDs are expected to remain the dominant medium for secondary storage due to predicted continuing advantages in recording capacity and price per unit of storage;[2][3] but SSDs are replacing HDDs where speed, power consumption and durability are more important considerations than price and capacity.[4][5]

History Edit

Main article: History of hard disk drives

HDDs were introduced in 1956 as data storage for an IBM real-time transaction processing computer[1] and were developed for use with general purpose mainframe and minicomputers. The first IBM drive, the 350 RAMAC, was approximately the size of two refrigerators and stored 5 million 6-bit characters (the equivalent of 3.75 million 8-bit bytes or 3.75 MB or megabytes) on a stack of 50 disks.

In 1961 IBM introduced the model 1311 disk drive, which was about the size of a washing machine and stored two million characters on a removable disk pack. Users could buy additional packs and interchange them as needed, much like reels of magnetic tape. Later models of removable pack drives, from IBM and others, became the norm in most computer installations and reached capacities of 300 megabytes by the early 1980s. Non-removable HDDs were called "fixed disk" drives.

Some high performance HDDs were manufactured with one head per track, e.g., IBM 2305 so that no time was lost physically moving the heads to a track.[6] Known as Fixed-Head or Head-Per-Track disk drives they were very expensive and are no longer in production.[7]

In 1973, IBM introduced a new type of HDD codenamed "Winchester". Its primary distinguishing feature was that the disk heads were not withdrawn completely from the stack of disk platters when the drive was powered down. Instead, the heads were allowed to "land" on a special area of the disk surface upon spin-down, "taking off" again when the disk was later powered on. This greatly reduced the cost of the head actuator mechanism, but precluded removing just the disks from the drive as was done with the disk packs of the day. Instead, the first models of "Winchester technology" drives featured a removable disk module, which included both the disk pack and the head assembly, leaving the actuator motor in the drive upon removal. Later "Winchester" drives abandoned the removable media concept and returned to non-removable platters.

Like the first removable pack drive, the first "Winchester" drives used platters Template:Convert in diameter. A few years later, designers were exploring the possibility that physically smaller platters might offer advantages. Drives with non-removable eight-inch platters appeared, and then drives that used a Template:Convert form factor (a mounting width equivalent to that used by contemporary floppy disk drives). The latter were primarily intended for the then-fledgling personal computer (PC) market.

As the 1980s began, HDDs were a rare and very expensive additional feature on PCs; however by the late 1980s, their cost had been reduced to the point where they were standard on all but the cheapest PC.

Most HDDs in the early 1980s were sold to PC end users as an external, add-on subsystem. The subsystem was not sold under the drive manufacturer's name but under the subsystem manufacturer's name such as Corvus Systems and Tallgrass Technologies, or under the PC system manufacturer's name such as the Apple ProFile. The IBM PC/XT in 1983 included an internal 10 MB HDD, and soon thereafter internal HDDs proliferated on personal computers.

External HDDs remained popular for much longer on the Apple Macintosh. Every Mac made between 1986 and 1998 has a SCSI port on the back, making external expansion easy; also, "toaster" Compact Macs did not have easily accessible HDD bays (or, in the case of the Mac Plus, any hard drive bay at all), so on those models, external SCSI disks were the only reasonable option.

Driven by areal density doubling every two to four years since their invention (an observation known as Kryder's law, similar to Moore's Law), HDDs have continuously improved their characteristics; a few highlights include:

  • Capacity per HDD increasing from 3.75 megabytes[1] to 4 terabytes or more, more than a million times larger.
  • Physical volume of HDD decreasing from Template:Convert[1] (comparable to a large side-by-side refrigerator), to less than Template:Convert,[8] a 100,000-to-1 decrease.
  • Weight decreasing from Template:Convert[1] to Template:Convert,[8] a 20,000-to-1 decrease.
  • Price decreasing from about Template:US$ per megabyte[9] to less than $0.00006 per megabyte ($90/1.5 terabyte), a greater than 250-million-to-1 decrease.[10]
  • Average Access Time decreasing from over 100 milliseconds to a few milliseconds, a greater than 40-to-1 improvement.
  • Market application expanding from mainframe computers of the late 1950s to most mass storage applications including computers and consumer applications such as storage of entertainment content.

Technology Edit


Magnetic recording Edit

Template:See also

An HDD records data by magnetizing a thin film of ferromagnetic materialTemplate:Refn on a disk. Sequential changes in the direction of magnetization represent binary data bits. The data is read from the disk by detecting the transitions in magnetization. User data is encoded using an encoding scheme, such as run-length limited encoding,Template:Refn which determines how the data is represented by the magnetic transitions.

A typical HDD design consists of a spindle that holds flat circular disks, also called platters, which hold the recorded data. The platters are made from a non-magnetic material, usually aluminium alloy, glass, or ceramic, and are coated with a shallow layer of magnetic material typically 10–20 nm in depth, with an outer layer of carbon for protection.[11][12][13] For reference, a standard piece of copy paper is Template:Convert.[14]

File:Hard drive-en.svg
File:Aufnahme einzelner Magnetisierungen gespeicherter Bits auf einem Festplatten-Platter..jpg
File:Perpendicular Recording Diagram.svg

The platters in contemporary HDDs are spun at speeds varying from 4,200 rpm in energy-efficient portable devices, to 15,000 rpm for high-performance servers.[16] The first HDDs spun at 1,200 rpm[1] and, for many years, 3,600 rpm was the norm.[17] As of December 2013, the platters in most consumer-grade HDDs spin at either 5,400 rpm or 7,200 rpm.

Information is written to and read from a platter as it rotates past devices called read-and-write heads that operate very close (often tens of nanometers) over the magnetic surface. The read-and-write head is used to detect and modify the magnetization of the material immediately under it.

In modern drives there is one head for each magnetic platter surface on the spindle, mounted on a common arm. An actuator arm (or access arm) moves the heads on an arc (roughly radially) across the platters as they spin, allowing each head to access almost the entire surface of the platter as it spins. The arm is moved using a voice coil actuator or in some older designs a stepper motor. Early hard disk drives wrote data at some constant bits per second, resulting in all tracks having the same amount of data per track but modern drives (since the 1990s) use zone bit recording—increasing the write speed from inner to outer zone and thereby storing more data per track in the outer zones.

In modern drives, the small size of the magnetic regions creates the danger that their magnetic state might be lost because of thermal effects. To counter this, the platters are coated with two parallel magnetic layers, separated by a 3-atom layer of the non-magnetic element ruthenium, and the two layers are magnetized in opposite orientation, thus reinforcing each other.[18] Another technology used to overcome thermal effects to allow greater recording densities is perpendicular recording, first shipped in 2005,[19] and as of 2007 the technology was used in many HDDs.[20][21][22]

Components Edit

File:Hard disk dismantled.jpg

A typical HDD has two electric motors; a spindle motor that spins the disks and an actuator (motor) that positions the read/write head assembly across the spinning disks. The disk motor has an external rotor attached to the disks; the stator windings are fixed in place. Opposite the actuator at the end of the head support arm is the read-write head; thin printed-circuit cables connect the read-write heads to amplifier electronics mounted at the pivot of the actuator. The head support arm is very light, but also stiff; in modern drives, acceleration at the head reaches 550 g.

File:Kopftraeger WD2500JS-00MHB0.jpg

The actuator is a permanent magnet and moving coil motor that swings the heads to the desired position. A metal plate supports a squat neodymium-iron-boron (NIB) high-flux magnet. Beneath this plate is the moving coil, often referred to as the voice coil by analogy to the coil in loudspeakers, which is attached to the actuator hub, and beneath that is a second NIB magnet, mounted on the bottom plate of the motor (some drives only have one magnet).

The voice coil itself is shaped rather like an arrowhead, and made of doubly coated copper magnet wire. The inner layer is insulation, and the outer is thermoplastic, which bonds the coil together after it is wound on a form, making it self-supporting. The portions of the coil along the two sides of the arrowhead (which point to the actuator bearing center) interact with the magnetic field, developing a tangential force that rotates the actuator. Current flowing radially outward along one side of the arrowhead and radially inward on the other produces the tangential force. If the magnetic field were uniform, each side would generate opposing forces that would cancel each other out. Therefore the surface of the magnet is half N pole, half S pole, with the radial dividing line in the middle, causing the two sides of the coil to see opposite magnetic fields and produce forces that add instead of canceling. Currents along the top and bottom of the coil produce radial forces that do not rotate the head.

The HDD's electronics control the movement of the actuator and the rotation of the disk, and perform reads and writes on demand from the disk controller. Feedback of the drive electronics is accomplished by means of special segments of the disk dedicated to servo feedback. These are either complete concentric circles (in the case of dedicated servo technology), or segments interspersed with real data (in the case of embedded servo technology). The servo feedback optimizes the signal to noise ratio of the GMR sensors by adjusting the voice-coil of the actuated arm. The spinning of the disk also uses a servo motor. Modern disk firmware is capable of scheduling reads and writes efficiently on the platter surfaces and remapping sectors of the media which have failed.

Template:AnchorError rates and handling Edit

Modern drives make extensive use of error correction codes (ECCs), particularly Reed–Solomon error correction. These techniques store extra bits, determined by mathematical formulas, for each block of data; the extra bits allow many errors to be corrected invisibly. The extra bits themselves take up space on the HDD, but allow higher recording densities to be employed without causing uncorrectable errors, resulting in much larger storage capacity.[23] For example, a typical 1 TB hard disk with 512-byte sectors provides additional capacity of about 93 GB for the ECC data.[24]

In the newest drives, as of 2009, low-density parity-check codes (LDPC) were supplanting Reed-Solomon; LDPC codes enable performance close to the Shannon Limit and thus provide the highest storage density available.[25]

Typical hard disk drives attempt to "remap" the data in a physical sector that is failing to a spare physical sector provided by the drive's "spare sector pool" (also called "reserve pool"),[26] while relying on the ECC to recover stored data while the amount of errors in a bad sector is still low enough. The S.M.A.R.T (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) feature counts the total number of errors in the entire HDD fixed by ECC, and the total number of performed sector remappings, as the occurrence of many such errors may predict an HDD failure.

The "No-ID Format", developed by IBM in the mid-1990s, contains information about which sectors are bad and where remapped sectors have been located.[27]

Only a tiny fraction of the detected errors ends up as not correctable. For example, specification for an enterprise SAS disk (a model from 2013) estimates this fraction to be one uncorrected error in every 1016 bits,[28] and another SAS enterprise disk from 2013 specifies similar error rates.[29] Another modern (as of 2013) enterprise SATA disk specifies an error rate of less than 10 non-recoverable read errors in every 1016 bits.[30] An enterprise disk with a Fibre Channel interface, which uses 520 byte sectors to support the Data Integrity Field standard to combat data corruption, specifies similar error rates in 2005.[31]

The worst type of errors are those that go unnoticed, and are not even detected by the disk firmware or the host operating system. These errors are known as silent data corruption, some of which may be caused by hard disk drive malfunctions.[32]

Future development Edit

HDD areal densities have shown a long term compound annual growth rate not substantively different from Moore's Law, most recently in the range of 20-25% annually, with desktop 3.5" drives estimated to hit 12 TB around 2016.[33] New magnetic storage technologies are being developed to support higher areal density growth and maintain the competitiveness of HDDs with potentially competitive products such as flash memory-based solid-state drives (SSDs). These new HDD technologies include:

With these new technologies the relative position of HDDs and SSDs with regard to their cost and performance is not projected to change through 2016.[33]

Capacity Edit

The capacity of an HDD reported to an end user by the operating system is less than the amount stated by a drive or system manufacturer due to amongst other things, different units of measuring capacity, capacity consumed by the file system and/or redundancy.

Calculation Edit

Because modern disk drives appear to their interface as a contiguous set of logical blocks their gross capacity can be calculated by multiplying the number of blocks by the size of the block. This information is available from the manufacturer's specification and from the drive itself through use of special utilities invoking low level commands.[37][38]

The gross capacity of older HDDs can be calculated by multiplying for each zone of the drive the number of cylinders by the number of heads by the number of sectors/zone by the number of bytes/sector (most commonly 512) and then summing the totals for all zones. Some modern SATA drives will also report cylinder-head-sector (C/H/S) values to the CPU but they are no longer actual physical parameters since the reported numbers are constrained by historic operating-system interfaces.

The old C/H/S scheme has been replaced by logical block addressing. In some cases, to try to "force-fit" the C/H/S scheme to large-capacity drives, the number of heads was given as 64, although no modern drive has anywhere near 32 platters: the typical 2 TB hard disk as of 2013 has two 1 TB platters (and 4 TB drives use four platters).

Redundancy Edit

In modern HDDs, spare capacity for defect management is not included in the published capacity; however in many early HDDs a certain number of sectors were reserved for spares, thereby reducing capacity available to end users.

In some systems, there may be hidden partitions used for system recovery that reduce the capacity available to the end user.

For RAID subsystems, data integrity and fault-tolerance requirements also reduce the realized capacity. For example, a RAID1 subsystem will be about half the total capacity as a result of data mirroring. RAID5 subsystems with x drives, would lose 1/x of capacity to parity. RAID subsystems are multiple drives that appear to be one drive or more drives to the user, but provides a great deal of fault-tolerance. Most RAID vendors use some form of checksums to improve data integrity at the block level. For many vendors, this involves using HDDs with sectors of 520 bytes per sector to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes or using separate 512-byte sectors for the checksum data.[39]

File system use Edit

Main article: Disk formatting

The presentation of an HDD to its host is determined by its controller. This may differ substantially from the drive's native interface particularly in mainframes or servers.

Modern HDDs, such as SAS[37] and SATA[38] drives, appear at their interfaces as a contiguous set of logical blocks; typically 512 bytes long but the industry is in the process of changing to 4,096-byte logical blocks; see Advanced Format.[40]

The process of initializing these logical blocks on the physical disk platters is called low level formatting which is usually performed at the factory and is not normally changed in the field.[note 2]

High level formatting then writes the file system structures into selected logical blocks to make the remaining logical blocks available to the host OS and its applications.[41] The operating system file system uses some of the disk space to organize files on the disk, recording their file names and the sequence of disk areas that represent the file. Examples of data structures stored on disk to retrieve files include the file allocation table (FAT) in the MS-DOS file system and inodes in many UNIX file systems, as well as other operating system data structures. As a consequence not all the space on an HDD is available for user files. This file system overhead is usually less than 1% on drives larger than 100 MB.

Units Edit

Template:See also

Unit prefixes[42][43]
Advertised capacity by manufacturer (using decimal multiples) Expected capacity by consumers in class action (using binary multiples) Reported capacity
Windows (using binary multiples) Mac OS X 10.6+ (using decimal multiples)
With prefix Bytes Bytes Diff.
100 MB 100,000,000 104,857,600 4.86% 95.4 MB 100 MB
100 GB 100,000,000,000 107,374,182,400 7.37% 93.1 GB, 95,367 MB 100 GB
TB 1,000,000,000,000 1,099,511,627,776 9.95% 931 GB, 953,674 MB 1,000 GB, 1,000,000 MB

The total capacity of HDDs is given by manufacturers in megabytes (1 MB = 1,000,000 bytes), gigabytes (1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes) or terabytes (1 TB = 1,000,000,000,000 bytes).[42][44][45][46][47][48] This numbering convention, where prefixes like mega- and giga- denote powers of 1,000, is also used for data transmission rates and DVD capacities. However, the convention is different from that used by manufacturers of memory (RAM, ROM) and CDs, where prefixes like kilo- and mega- mean powers of 1,024.

The practice of using prefixes assigned to powers of 1,000 within the HDD and computer industries dates back to the early days of computing.[49] By the 1970s million, mega and M were consistently being used in the powers of 1,000 sense to describe HDD capacity.[50][51][52]

Computers do not internally represent HDD or memory capacity in powers of 1,024; reporting it in this manner is just a convention.[53] Microsoft Windows uses the powers of 1,024 convention when reporting HDD capacity, thus an HDD offered by its manufacturer as a 1 TB drive is reported by these OSes as a 931 GB HDD. Mac OS X 10.6 ("Snow Leopard"), uses powers of 1,000 when reporting HDD capacity.

In the case of "mega-", there is a nearly 5% difference between the powers of 1,000 definition and the powers of 1,024 definition. Furthermore, the difference is compounded by 2.4% with each incrementally larger prefix (gigabyte, terabyte, etc.). The discrepancy between the two conventions for measuring capacity was the subject of several class action suits against HDD manufacturers. The plaintiffs argued that the use of decimal measurements effectively misled consumers[54][55] while the defendants denied any wrongdoing or liability, asserting that their marketing and advertising complied in all respects with the law and that no class member sustained any damages or injuries.[56]

In December 1998, standards organizations addressed these dual definitions of the conventional prefixes by standardizing on unique binary prefixes and prefix symbols to denote multiples of 1,024, such as "mebibyte (MiB)", which exclusively denotes 220 or 1,048,576 bytes.[57] This standard has seen little adoption by the computer industry, and the conventionally prefixed forms of "byte" continue to denote slightly different values depending on context.[58][59]

Template:AnchorForm factors Edit

Past and present HDD form factors
Form factor Status Length [mm] Width [mm] Height [mm] Largest capacity Platters (max) Capacity
Per platter [GB]
3.5" Current 146 101.6 19 or 25.4 6 TB[60][61][62] (2013) 5 or 7[63][note 3] 1000
2.5" Current 100 69.85 5,[64] 7, 9.5,[note 4] 12.5, or 15 2 TB[65][note 5] (2012) 4 694[66]
1.8" Current 71 54 5 or 8 320 GB[67][note 6] (2009) 2 220 [68]
8" Obsolete 362 241.3 117.5
5.25" FH Obsolete 203 146 82.6 47 GB[69] (1998) 14 3.36
5.25" HH Obsolete 203 146 41.4 19.3 GB[70] (1998) 4[note 7] 4.83
1.3" Obsolete 43 40 GB[71] (2007) 1 40
1" (CFII/ZIF/IDE-Flex) Obsolete 42 20 GB (2006) 1 20
0.85" Obsolete 32 24 5 8 GB[72][73] (2004) 1 8

Mainframe and minicomputer hard disks were of widely varying dimensions, typically in free standing cabinets the size of washing machines or designed to fit a 19" rack. In 1962, IBM introduced its model 1311 disk, which used 14 inch (nominal size) platters. This became a standard size for mainframe and minicomputer drives for many years.[74] Such large platters were never used with microprocessor-based systems.

With increasing sales of microcomputers having built in floppy-disk drives (FDDs), HDDs that would fit to the FDD mountings became desirable. Thus HDD Form factors, initially followed those of 8-inch, 5.25-inch, and 3.5-inch floppy disk drives. Because there were no smaller floppy disk drives, smaller HDD form factors developed from product offerings or industry standards.

8 inch
Template:Val × Template:Val × Template:Val (Template:Val × Template:Val × Template:Val). In 1979, Shugart Associates' SA1000 was the first form factor compatible HDD, having the same dimensions and a compatible interface to the 8" FDD.
5.25 inch
5.75 in × 3.25 in × 8 in (146.1 mm × 82.55 mm × 203 mm). This smaller form factor, first used in an HDD by Seagate in 1980,[75] was the same size as full-height Template:Convert FDD, 3.25-inches high. This is twice as high as "half height"; i.e., 1.63 in (41.4 mm). Most desktop models of drives for optical 120 mm disks (DVD, CD) use the half height 5¼" dimension, but it fell out of fashion for HDDs. The format was standardized as EIA-741 and co-published as SFF-8501 for disk drives, with other SFF-85xx series standards covering related 5.25 inch devices (optical drives, etc.)[76] The Quantum Bigfoot HDD was the last to use it in the late 1990s, with "low-profile" (≈25 mm) and "ultra-low-profile" (≈20 mm) high versions.
3.5 inch
4 in × 1 in × 5.75 in (101.6 mm × 25.4 mm × 146 mm) = 376.77344 cm³. This smaller form factor is similar to that used in an HDD by Rodime in 1983,[77] which was the same size as the "half height" 3½" FDD, i.e., 1.63 inches high. Today, the 1-inch high ("slimline" or "low-profile") version of this form factor is the most popular form used in most desktops. The format was standardized in terms of dimensions and positions of mounting holes as EIA/ECA-740, co-published as SFF-8301.[78]
2.5 inch
Template:Val × 0.275–Template:Val × Template:Val (Template:Val × 7–Template:Val × Template:Val) = 48.895–Template:Val. This smaller form factor was introduced by PrairieTek in 1988;[79] there is no corresponding FDD. The 2.5 drive format is standardized in the EIA/ECA-720 co-published as SFF-8201; when used with specific connectors, more detailed specifications are SFF-8212 for the 50-pin (ATA laptop) connector, SFF-8223 with the SATA, or SAS connector and SFF-8222 with the SCA-2 connector.[80] It came to be widely used for HDDs in mobile devices (laptops, music players, etc.) and for solid-state drives (SSDs), by 2008 replacing some 3.5 inch enterprise-class drives.[81] It is also used in the PlayStation 3[82] and Xbox 360Template:Citation needed video game consoles. Drives 9.5 mm high became an unofficial standard for all except the largest-capacity laptop drives (usually having two platters inside); 12.5 mm-high drives, typically with three platters, are used for maximum capacity, but will not fit most laptop computers. Enterprise-class drives can have a height up to 15 mm.[83] Seagate released a 7 mm drive aimed at entry level laptops and high end netbooks in December 2009.[84] Western Digital released on April 23, 2013 a hard drive 5 mm in height specifically aimed at UltraBooks.[85]
1.8 inch
54 mm × 8 mm × 71 mm = 30.672 cm³. This form factor, originally introduced by Integral Peripherals in 1993, evolved into the ATA-7 LIF with dimensions as stated. For a time it was increasingly used in digital audio players and subnotebooks, but its popularity decreased to the point where this form factor is increasingly rare and only a small percentage of the overall market.[86] There was an attempt to standardize this format as SFF-8123, but it was cancelled in 2005.[87]
1 inch
42.8 mm × 5 mm × 36.4 mm. This form factor was introduced in 1999 as IBM's Microdrive to fit inside a CF Type II slot. Samsung calls the same form factor "1.3 inch" drive in its product literature.[88]
0.85 inch
24 mm × 5 mm × 32 mm. Toshiba announced this form factor in January 2004[89] for use in mobile phones and similar applications, including SD/MMC slot compatible HDDs optimized for video storage on 4G handsets. Toshiba manufactured a 4 GB (MK4001MTD) and an 8 GB (MK8003MTD) version[90] and holds the Guinness World Record for the smallest HDD.[91]
File:5.25 inch MFM hard disk drive.JPG

Template:As of, 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch hard disks were the most popular sizes.

By 2009 all manufacturers had discontinued the development of new products for the 1.3-inch, 1-inch and 0.85-inch form factors due to falling prices of flash memory,[92][93] which has no moving parts.

While these sizes are customarily described by an approximately correct figure in inches, actual sizes have long been specified in millimeters.

Performance characteristics Edit

Main article: Hard disk drive performance characteristics

Time to access data Edit

The factors that limit the time to access the data on an HDD are mostly related to the mechanical nature of the rotating disks and moving heads. Seek time is a measure of how long it takes the head assembly to travel to the track of the disk that contains data. Rotational latency is incurred because the desired disk sector may not be directly under the head when data transfer is requested. These two delays are on the order of milliseconds each. The bit rate or data transfer rate (once the head is in the right position) creates delay which is a function of the number of blocks transferred; typically relatively small, but can be quite long with the transfer of large contiguous files. Delay may also occur if the drive disks are stopped to save energy.

An HDD's Average Access Time is its average Seek time which technically is the time to do all possible seeks divided by the number of all possible seeks, but in practice is determined by statistical methods or simply approximated as the time of a seek over one-third of the number of tracks.[94]

Defragmentation is a procedure used to minimize delay in retrieving data by moving related items to physically proximate areas on the disk.[95] Some computer operating systems perform defragmentation automatically. Although automatic defragmentation is intended to reduce access delays, performance will be temporarily reduced while the procedure is in progress.[96]

Time to access data can be improved by increasing rotational speed (thus reducing latency) and/or by reducing the time spent seeking. Increasing areal density increases throughput by increasing data rate and by increasing the amount of data under a set of heads, thereby potentially reducing seek activity for a given amount of data. Based on historic trends, analysts predict a future growth in HDD areal density (and therefore capacity) of about 40% per year.[97] The time to access data has not kept up with throughput increases, which themselves have not kept up with growth in storage capacity.

Template:AnchorSeek time Edit

Template:See also

Average seek time ranges from under 4 ms for high-end server drives[98] to 15 ms for mobile drives, with the most common mobile drives at about 12 ms[99] and the most common desktop type typically being around 9 ms. The first HDD had an average seek time of about 600 ms;[1] by the middle of 1970s HDDs were available with seek times of about 25 ms.[100] Some early PC drives used a stepper motor to move the heads, and as a result had seek times as slow as 80–120 ms, but this was quickly improved by voice coil type actuation in the 1980s, reducing seek times to around 20 ms. Seek time has continued to improve slowly over time.

Some desktop and laptop computer systems allow the user to make a tradeoff between seek performance and drive noise. Faster seek rates typically require more energy usage to quickly move the heads across the platter, causing louder noises from the pivot bearing and greater device vibrations as the heads are rapidly accelerated during the start of the seek motion and decelerated at the end of the seek motion. Quiet operation reduces movement speed and acceleration rates, but at a cost of reduced seek performance.

Latency Edit

Latency is the delay for the rotation of the disk to bring the required disk sector under the read-write mechanism. It depends on rotational speed of a disk, measured in revolutions per minute (rpm). Average rotational latency is shown in the table below, based on the statistical relation that the average latency in milliseconds for such a drive is one-half the rotational period.

Rotational speed
Average latency
15,000 2
10,000 3
7,200 4.16
5,400 5.55
4,800 6.25

Data transfer rate Edit

Template:As of, a typical 7,200-rpm desktop HDD has a sustained "disk-to-buffer" data transfer rate up to 1,030 Mbits/sec.[101] This rate depends on the track location; the rate is higher for data on the outer tracks (where there are more data sectors per rotation) and lower toward the inner tracks (where there are fewer data sectors per rotation); and is generally somewhat higher for 10,000-rpm drives. A current widely used standard for the "buffer-to-computer" interface is 3.0 Gbit/s SATA, which can send about 300 megabyte/s (10-bit encoding) from the buffer to the computer, and thus is still comfortably ahead of today's disk-to-buffer transfer rates. Data transfer rate (read/write) can be measured by writing a large file to disk using special file generator tools, then reading back the file. Transfer rate can be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout of the files.[95]

HDD data transfer rate depends upon the rotational speed of the platters and the data recording density. Because heat and vibration limit rotational speed, advancing density becomes the main method to improve sequential transfer rates. Higher speeds require a more powerful spindle motor, which creates more heat. While areal density advances by increasing both the number of tracks across the disk and the number of sectors per track, only the latter increases the data transfer rate for a given rpm. Since data transfer rate performance only tracks one of the two components of areal density, its performance improves at a lower rate.Template:Citation needed

Other considerations Edit

Other performance considerations include power consumption, audible noise, and shock resistance.

Access and interfaces Edit

File:Seagate ST33232A hard disk inner view.jpg
Main article: Hard disk drive interface

HDDs are accessed over one of a number of bus types, including Template:As of parallel ATA (PATA, also called IDE or EIDE; described before the introduction of SATA as ATA), Serial ATA (SATA), SCSI, Serial Attached SCSI (SAS), and Fibre Channel. Bridge circuitry is sometimes used to connect HDDs to buses with which they cannot communicate natively, such as IEEE 1394, USB and SCSI.

Modern HDDs present a consistent interface to the rest of the computer, no matter what data encoding scheme is used internally. Typically a DSP in the electronics inside the HDD takes the raw analog voltages from the read head and uses PRML and Reed–Solomon error correction[102] to decode the sector boundaries and sector data, then sends that data out the standard interface. That DSP also watches the error rate detected by error detection and correction, and performs bad sector remapping, data collection for Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology, and other internal tasks.

Modern interfaces connect an HDD to a host bus interface adapter (today typically integrated into the "south bridge") with one data/control cable. Each drive also has an additional power cable, usually direct to the power supply unit.

  • Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), originally named SASI for Shugart Associates System Interface, was standard on servers, workstations, Commodore Amiga, Atari ST and Apple Macintosh computers through the mid-1990s, by which time most models had been transitioned to IDE (and later, SATA) family disks. The range limitations of the data cable allows for external SCSI devices.
  • Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE), later standardized under the name AT Attachment (ATA, with the alias P-ATA or PATA (Parallel ATA) retroactively added upon introduction of SATA) moved the HDD controller from the interface card to the disk drive. This helped to standardize the host/contoller interface, reduce the programming complexity in the host device driver, and reduced system cost and complexity. The 40-pin IDE/ATA connection transfers 16 bits of data at a time on the data cable. The data cable was originally 40-conductor, but later higher speed requirements for data transfer to and from the HDD led to an "ultra DMA" mode, known as UDMA. Progressively swifter versions of this standard ultimately added the requirement for an 80-conductor variant of the same cable, where half of the conductors provides grounding necessary for enhanced high-speed signal quality by reducing cross talk.
  • EIDE was an unofficial update (by Western Digital) to the original IDE standard, with the key improvement being the use of direct memory access (DMA) to transfer data between the disk and the computer without the involvement of the CPU, an improvement later adopted by the official ATA standards. By directly transferring data between memory and disk, DMA eliminates the need for the CPU to copy byte per byte, therefore allowing it to process other tasks while the data transfer occurs.
  • Fibre Channel (FC) is a successor to parallel SCSI interface on enterprise market. It is a serial protocol. In disk drives usually the Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) connection topology is used. FC has much broader usage than mere disk interfaces, and it is the cornerstone of storage area networks (SANs). Recently other protocols for this field, like iSCSI and ATA over Ethernet have been developed as well. Confusingly, drives usually use copper twisted-pair cables for Fibre Channel, not fibre optics. The latter are traditionally reserved for larger devices, such as servers or disk array controllers.
  • Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). The SAS is a new generation serial communication protocol for devices designed to allow for much higher speed data transfers and is compatible with SATA. SAS uses a mechanically identical data and power connector to standard 3.5-inch SATA1/SATA2 HDDs, and many server-oriented SAS RAID controllers are also capable of addressing SATA HDDs. SAS uses serial communication instead of the parallel method found in traditional SCSI devices but still uses SCSI commands.
  • Serial ATA (SATA). The SATA data cable has one data pair for differential transmission of data to the device, and one pair for differential receiving from the device, just like EIA-422. That requires that data be transmitted serially. A similar differential signaling system is used in RS485, LocalTalk, USB, FireWire, and differential SCSI.

Integrity and failure Edit

File:Hard disk head.jpg
Main article: Hard disk drive failure

Due to the extremely close spacing between the heads and the disk surface, HDDs are vulnerable to being damaged by a head crash—a failure of the disk in which the head scrapes across the platter surface, often grinding away the thin magnetic film and causing data loss. Head crashes can be caused by electronic failure, a sudden power failure, physical shock, contamination of the drive's internal enclosure, wear and tear, corrosion, or poorly manufactured platters and heads.

The HDD's spindle system relies on air density inside the disk enclosure to support the heads at their proper flying height while the disk rotates. HDDs require a certain range of air densities in order to operate properly. The connection to the external environment and density occurs through a small hole in the enclosure (about 0.5 mm in breadth), usually with a filter on the inside (the breather filter).[103] If the air density is too low, then there is not enough lift for the flying head, so the head gets too close to the disk, and there is a risk of head crashes and data loss. Specially manufactured sealed and pressurized disks are needed for reliable high-altitude operation, above about Template:Convert.[104] Modern disks include temperature sensors and adjust their operation to the operating environment. Breather holes can be seen on all disk drives—they usually have a sticker next to them, warning the user not to cover the holes. The air inside the operating drive is constantly moving too, being swept in motion by friction with the spinning platters. This air passes through an internal recirculation (or "recirc") filter to remove any leftover contaminants from manufacture, any particles or chemicals that may have somehow entered the enclosure, and any particles or outgassing generated internally in normal operation. Very high humidity for extended periods can corrode the heads and platters.

For giant magnetoresistive (GMR) heads in particular, a minor head crash from contamination (that does not remove the magnetic surface of the disk) still results in the head temporarily overheating, due to friction with the disk surface, and can render the data unreadable for a short period until the head temperature stabilizes (so called "thermal asperity", a problem which can partially be dealt with by proper electronic filtering of the read signal).

When the logic board of a hard disk fails, the drive can often be restored to functioning order and the data recovered by replacing the circuit board of one of an identical hard disk. In the case of read-write head faults, they can be replaced using specialized tools in a dust-free environment. If the disk platters are undamaged, they can be transferred into an identical enclosure and the data can be copied or cloned onto a new drive. In the event of disk-platter failures, disassembly and imaging of the disk platters may be required.[105] For logical damage to file systems, a variety of tools, including fsck on UNIX-like systems and CHKDSK on Windows, can be used for data recovery. Recovery from logical damage can require file carving.

A common expectation is that hard disk drives designed for server use will fail less frequently than consumer-grade drives usually used in desktop computers. A study by Carnegie Mellon University[106] and an independent one by Google[107] both found that the "grade" of a drive does not relate to the drive's failure rate.

A 2011 summary of research into SSD and magnetic disk failure patterns by Tom's Hardware summarized research findings as follows:[108]

  • MTBF does not indicate reliability; the annualized failure rate is higher and usually more relevant.
  • Magnetic disks do not have a specific tendency to fail during early use, and temperature only has a minor effect; instead, failure rates steadily increase with age.
  • S.M.A.R.T. warns of mechanical issues but not other issues affecting reliability, and is therefore not a reliable indicator of condition.
  • Failure rates of drives sold as "enterprise" and "consumer" are "very much similar", although customized for their different environments.
  • In drive arrays, one drive's failure significantly increases the short-term chance of a second drive failing.

Template:AnchorExternal hard disk drives Edit

Template:See also

Template:Multiple image

External HDDs[note 8] typically connect via USB; variants using USB 2.0 interface generally have slower data transfer rates when compared to internally mounted hard drives connected through SATA. Plug and play drive functionality offers system compatibility and features large storage options and portable design.

External HDDs are usually available as pre-assembled integrated products, but may be also assembled by combining an external enclosure (with USB or other interface) with a separately purchased HDD. They are available in 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch sizes; 2.5-inch variants are typically called portable external drives, while 3.5-inch variants are referred to as desktop external drives. "Portable" drives are packaged in smaller and lighter enclosures than the "desktop" drives; additionally, "portable" drives use power provided by the USB connection, while "desktop" drives require external power bricks.

Template:As of, capacities of external HDDs generally range from 160 GB to 2 TB; common sizes are 160 GB, 250 GB, 320 GB, 500 GB, 640 GB, 750 GB, 1 TB, 2 TB, 3 TB and 4 TB.[109][110] Features such as biometric security or multiple interfaces (for example, Firewire) are available at a higher cost.[111]

There are pre-assembled external hard disk drives that, when taken out from their enclosures, cannot be used internally in a laptop or desktop computer due to embedded USB interface on their printed circuit boards, and lack of SATA (or Parallel ATA) interfaces.[112][113]

Market segments Edit

Desktop HDDs
They typically store between 60 GB and 4 TB and rotate at 5,400 to 10,000 rpm, and have a media transfer rate of 0.5 Gbit/s or higher (1 GB = 109 bytes; 1 Gbit/s = 109 bit/s). Template:As of, the highest capacity consumer HDDs store 4 TB.[114]
Mobile (laptop) HDDs
They are smaller than their desktop and enterprise counterparts, tend to be slower and have lower capacity. Mobile HDDs spin at 4,200 rpm, 5,200 rpm, 5,400 rpm, or 7,200 rpm, with 5,400 rpm being typical. 7,200 rpm drives tend to be more expensive and have smaller capacities, while 4,200 rpm models usually have very high storage capacities. Because of smaller platter(s), mobile HDDs generally have lower capacity than their greater desktop counterparts. As a note, there are also 2.5-inch drives spinning at 10,000 rpm which are belonging to the enterprise segment, thus not intended to be used in laptops.
Enterprise HDDs
Typically used with multiple-user computers running enterprise software. Examples are: transaction processing databases, internet infrastructure (email, webserver, e-commerce), scientific computing software, and nearline storage management software. Enterprise drives commonly operate continuously ("24/7") in demanding environments while delivering the highest possible performance without sacrificing reliability. Maximum capacity is not the primary goal, and as a result the drives are often offered in capacities that are relatively low in relation to their cost.[115] The fastest enterprise HDDs spin at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm, and can achieve sequential media transfer speeds above 1.6 Gbit/s[116] and a sustained transfer rate up to 1 Gbit/s.[116] Drives running at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm use smaller platters to mitigate increased power requirements (as they have less air drag) and therefore generally have lower capacity than the highest capacity desktop drives. Enterprise HDDs are commonly connected through Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or Fibre Channel (FC). Some support multiple ports, so they can be connected to a redundant host bus adapter. They can be reformatted with sector sizes larger than 512 bytes (often 520, 524, 528 or 536 bytes). The additional storage can be used by hardware RAID cards or to store a Data Integrity Field.
Consumer electronics HDDs
They include drives embedded into digital video recorders and automotive vehicles. The former are configured to provide a guaranteed streaming capacity, even in the face of read and write errors, while the latter are built to resist larger amounts of shock.

Manufacturers and sales Edit

File:Diagram of Hard Disk Drive Manufacturer Consolidation.svg

Template:See also

More than 200 companies have manufactured HDDs over time. But consolidations have concentrated production into just three manufacturers today: Western Digital, Seagate, and Toshiba.

Worldwide revenues for HDDs shipments are expected to reach $33 billion in 2013, down about 12% from $37.8 billion in 2012. This corresponds to a 2013 unit shipment forecast of 552 million compared to 577 million units in 2012 and 624 million units in 2011. The estimated 2013 market shares are about 40-45% each for Seagate and Western Digital and 13-16% for Toshiba[117]

Icons Edit

HDDs are traditionally symbolized as a stylized stack of platters or as a cylinder and are found in diagrams, or on lights to indicate HDD access. In most modern operating systems, HDDs are represented by an illustration or photograph of the drive enclosure.

See also Edit

Template:Portal Template:Div col

Template:Div col end

Notes Edit

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named IBM350
  2. Script error
  3. Script error
  4. Hutchinson, Lee. (2012-06-25) How SSDs conquered mobile devices and modern OSes. Ars Technica. Retrieved on 2013-01-07.
  5. Script error
  6. Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Resource Guide © 1995, Chapter 17 – Disk and File System Basics
  7. Computer Organization and Design, 2nd Ed., P. Pal Chaudhuri, © 2006,p. 635
  8. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named ToshMK
  9. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-3
  10. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-4
  11. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named headcrash
  12. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-6
  13. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-7
  14. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-8
  15. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-9
  16. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-10
  17. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-12
  18. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-15
  19. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-16
  20. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-17
  21. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-18
  22. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-19
  23. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-20
  24. Script error
  25. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-21
  26. Script error
  27. Charles M. Kozierok. "The PC Guide: Hard Disk: Sector Format and Structure". 1997-2004.
  28. Script error
  29. Script error
  30. Script error
  31. Script error
  32. Script error
  33. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Coughlin
  34. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-23
  35. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-24
  36. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-22
  37. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named SAS
  38. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named SATA
  39. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-38
  40. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-35
  41. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-37
  42. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named SeagateStorageGuide
  43. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named WD2
  44. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named WD
  45. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-25a
  46. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-25b
  47. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-25d
  48. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-25e
  49. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-26
  50. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-27
  51. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-28
  52. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-29
  53. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named Apple
  54. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named WDSettle
  55. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-30
  56. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-31
  57. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-32
  58. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-33
  59. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-34
  60. HGST Ships 6TB Ultrastar® He6 Helium-filled Drives for High-density, Massive Scale-out Data Center Environments.
  61. First helium-filled 6TB hard drive launched, just not for you.
  62. 750 GB for IDE-based barebone.
  63. Script error
  64. Script error
  65. Script error
  66. Script error
  67. Script error
  68. Script error
  69. Seagate Elite 47, shipped 12/97 per 1998 Disk/Trend Report – Rigid Disk Drives
  70. Quantum Bigfoot TS, shipped 10/98 per 1999 Disk/Trend Report – Rigid Disk Drives
  71. Script error
  72. Script error
  73. Script error
  74. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-39
  75. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-40
  76. Script error
  77. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-41
  78. Script error
  79. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-42
  80. Script error
  81. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-43
  82. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-44
  83. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-45
  84. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-46
  85. Western Digital rolls out ultra-slim 5 mm Ultrabook drives.
  86. Script error
  87. Script error
  88. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-47
  89. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-48
  90. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-49
  91. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-50
  92. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-51
  93. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-52
  94. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-66
  95. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named itworld-2001-04-18
  96. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-67
  97. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-68
  98. Script error
  99. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named WD-Scorpio_Blue-specs
  100. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-70
  101. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-71
  102. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-79
  103. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-80
  104. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-81
  105. Script error
  106. Script error
  107. Script error
  108. Investigation: Is Your SSD More Reliable Than A Hard Drive?Tom's Hardware long term SSD reliability review, 2011, "final words"
  109. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-96
  110. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-97
  111. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-98
  112. Script error
  113. Script error
  114. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named FourTB
  115. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named AutoMK-99
  116. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named erwpnw
  117. Script error

References Edit

Further reading Edit

External links Edit

Template:Sister project links

Template:Magnetic storage media Template:Hard disk drive manufacturers Template:Basic computer components Template:Disk images

Cite error: <ref> tags exist for a group named "note", but no corresponding <references group="note"/> tag was found.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.