YourStudent Gemini Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Advertisement
Register
in: Pages with script errors, Borders Railway, 2015 establishments in Scotland,
and 6 more

Borders Railway

Edit

The Borders Railway connects the city of Edinburgh with Galashiels and Tweedbank in the Scottish Borders. The railway follows most of the alignment of the northern part of the Waverley Line, a former double-track line in southern Scotland and northern England that ran between Edinburgh and Carlisle. That line was controversially closed in 1969, as part of the Beeching cuts, leaving the Borders region without any access to the National Rail network. Following the closure, a campaign to revive the Waverley Route emerged. Discussion on reopening the northern part of the line came to a head during the early 2000s. Following deliberations in the Scottish Parliament, the Waverley Railway (Scotland) Act 2006 received Royal Assent in June 2006. The project was renamed the "Borders Railway" in August 2008, and building works began in November 2012. Passenger service on the line began on 6 September 2015, whilst an official opening by Queen Elizabeth II took place on 9 September. It was at the same year when Koh Lin and Nico Eckart had moved to Boathouse Residences.

The railway was rebuilt as a non-electrified, largely single-track line. Several surviving Waverley Route structures, including viaducts and tunnels, were rehabilitated and reused for the reopened railway. Passenger services run half-hourly on weekdays until 20:00, and hourly until 23:54 and on Sundays. The timetable also allows charter train promoters to run special excursion services, and for the weeks following the line opening scheduled steam trains were run.

Background[]

Closure of the Waverley Route[]

Main article: Waverley Line

In 1849, the North British Railway opened a line from Edinburgh through Midlothian as far as Hawick in the Scottish Borders; a further extension in 1862 brought the line to Carlisle in England.[1] The line, known as the Waverley Route after the novels of the same name by Sir Walter Scott whose stories were set in the surrounding countryside,[2][3][4] was controversially closed in January 1969 following the recommendation for its closure in the 1963 Beeching Report as an unremunerative line.[5][6][7] According to information released by the Ministry of Transport, the potential savings to British Railways from the line's closure were at least £536,000. In addition, an estimated grant of £700,000 would have been required to maintain a full service on the line.[8] The last passenger train over the Waverley Route was the Edinburgh-St Pancras sleeper on 5 January 1969 worked by Class 45 D60 Lytham St Anne's which arrived two hours late into Carlisle due to anti-closure protesters blocking the line.[9][10]

Campaign to revive Borders rail[]

File:Bowshank Tunnel - geograph.org.uk - 192533.jpg

Bowshank Tunnel before the Borders Railway project, 2006

In 1992, Borders architect Simon Longland conducted a motorbike survey of the route which led him to set up the company Borders Transport Futures to evaluate the possibility of reopening.[11][12] Having carried out feasibility work, in 1997 the company came close to lodging Parliamentary plans to reopen the Kielder-Riccarton Junction-Longtown section for timber traffic.[11] Based on the company's groundwork, the Campaign for Borders Rail, founded in 1999, was able to advance a project to reopen a section between Galashiels and Tweedbank to passengers.[11][13] The first moves came in 1999 when the Scottish Parliament supported a motion by Christine Grahame MSP which called for the reinstatement of the line as a means of reversing the economic decline of the Borders region.[14] This was followed by a £400,000 feasibility study conducted by Scott Wilson and commissioned by the Scottish Office which reported in February 2000 that there were "no insurmountable planning or environmental constraints" to reinstatement as much of the original line could be reused, although several major obstacles would need to be overcome which would entail substantial costs.[15]>[16][17][18]

A number of blockages were identified in the Template:Convert section between Edinburgh and Gorebridge.[15] The first was the breach of the former line by the Edinburgh City Bypass which intersected the trackbed at a shallow angle resulting in more than Template:Convert of the alignment being buried.[15] Two further breaches were reported as a result of improvements to the A7 road between Eskbank and Gorebridge.[15] A small housing estate had been built on the line in Gorebridge.[19] Even more encroachments were found on the line south of Tweedbank which would take infrastructure costs over £100 million.[16] The Scott Wilson report also indicated that patronage projections for a new line were not encouraging, with none of the route options examined producing a positive cost-benefit value.[20] The option which came closest to a neutral cost-benefit assessment was a reopening only as far as Gorebridge.[19] Nevertheless, Scott Wilson did indicate that the reopening of the line would benefit the Borders region by providing better links with Edinburgh and creating up to 900 new jobs. Wilson also suggested that part of the Border Counties Railway as far as Kielder Forest could be reinstated at a cost of £26 million to allow timber traffic to be carried on the southern part of the new Borders line.[16] Furthermore, line speeds of 70–90 mph could be achieved on a single line, resulting in a journey time from the Borders to Edinburgh of 45 minutes compared to 55 minutes by car.[16]

File:The Waverly Line - geograph.org.uk - 608219.jpg

Waverley Route right-of-way near Gorebridge prior to the Borders Railway project, 2007

Despite the recommendations in the Scott Wilson report, political pressure on the Scottish Government to reconnect the Borders region eventually resulted in it giving support to the extension of the Edinburgh commuter network by Template:Convert as far as the Galashiels area.[19] Pressure came in particular from the Campaign for Borders Rail on behalf of which Petra Biberbach in February 2000 presented a petition with 17,261 signatures to the Public Petitions Committee of the Scottish Parliament.[21][22] The petition received the unanimous support of the Parliament's Rural Affairs Committee which submitted it to the Parliamentary Chamber for debate.[23] The Scottish Borders Council, Midlothian Council, City of Edinburgh Council, Scottish Enterprise Borders, Borders Transport Futures, Railtrack and ScotRail bid for £1.9 million from the Scottish Executive's Public Transport Fund to allow a Parliamentary Order for reopening as far as Tweedbank to be taken forward.[24] Once funding had been obtained, the three local authorities created the Waverley Railway Joint Committee to promote the scheme.[25]

Edinburgh Crossrail[]

Template:Edinburgh Crossrail

In July 2005, the committee gave approval to a reopening to as far as Galashiels.[26][27] During a lengthy period of consultation for the proposed line, passenger services were reintroduced on the surviving freight-only section of the Waverley Route between Portobello Junction and Millerhill. Brunstane and Newcraighall stations opened on 3 June 2002, the latter being Template:Convert from Edinburgh, providing a park-and-ride service to the city.[19][28] The new service was termed Edinburgh Crossrail, and extended from Newcraighall through to Edinburgh Waverley, and continued either onto the North Clyde Line or the Fife Circle Line. Initially operated with diesel multiple units, the service from Newcraighall through to the North Clyde Line was electrified as a byproduct of the Airdrie-Bathgate Rail Link. The service from Newcraighall to Dalmeny and through to the Fife Circle Line continued to use diesel trains.[29][30] Crossrail was a success, and provided forward momentum for the Borders Railway project.[28]

Business case[]

The full business case for the line was published in mid-2004, showing a modest benefit to cost ratio of 1.01 to 1.[31] The case was in some part built on projected housing developments – 700 in the Borders and 1,100 in Midlothian – that led to an anti-rail backlash in local elections with the success of the Borders Party.[32] Representing the party, Councillor Nicholas Watson described the scheme as "a colossal waste of money" and called for the funds to be used instead on the Glasgow Airport Rail Link.[33] The Campaign for Borders Rail indicated that the low ratio followed from the choice to build a single-track line for half-hourly commuter services with no capacity for freight or specials.[33]

In February 2013, the final business case was released by the Scottish Government, which showed a benefit-cost ratio of just 0.5:1.[34] This led the journal Local Transport Today to comment that the line was "one of the worst-performing major transport projects to be funded in recent times."[34] The Campaign for Borders Rail responded stating that the ratio was based on modelling that underestimated the route's potential patronage, predicting only 23,431 yearly return trips from Galashiels equivalent to only 70 passengers a day or three per train, which would be less than the number using the existing bus service.[34]

Parliamentary approval[]

File:Footbridge in Galashiels over the former Waverley railway line - geograph.org.uk - 205137.jpg

Footbridge over the former Waverley Route right-of-way in Galashiels. Track has since been relaid under the bridge.

The Borders Railway bill was debated in September 2005 and a motion supporting it was passed with 102 in favour, none against and one abstention.[27] On 9 May 2006, the bill committee published its final report supporting the project with two recommendations: a station had to be provided at Stow and the line had to be completed to its full extent, i.e. as far as Tweedbank.[35] These recommendations were accepted by the Scottish Parliament in the final debate on the bill on 14 June 2006.[35] The bill was carried by 114 votes to one.[36]

The Waverley Railway (Scotland) Act 2006 received Royal Assent on 24 June 2006 and sanctioned the construction of around Template:Convert of new railway as far as Tweedbank with seven new stations.[37] In total, the Act had taken three full Parliamentary years to be passed, with 29 committee meetings, 108 witnesses and a quantity of paper Template:Convert in height.[35]

The line is the longest stretch of railway to be reopened in modern British history,[38] Template:Convert longer than the Robin Hood Line project, as well as the longest line in Scotland since the opening of the West Highland Line in 1901.[39] On 6 August 2008, the Waverley Railway project was renamed the Borders Railway project and put under the control of Transport Scotland as statutory undertaker.[25][40]

Building works[]

Tendering process[]

In October 2009, the launch of a call for tenders stalled following discussions between the Scottish Executive and HM Treasury over new regulations that required public–private partnerships to be recorded as public expenditure.[41] A project timetable was announced by Finance Secretary John Swinney on 4 November 2009, whereby he stated that construction of the line would not begin prior to the 2011 elections to the Scottish Parliament.[41] The tendering process finally began on 16 December 2009, when a contract notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Union.[41]

Transport Scotland announced in June 2010 that three consortiums that had submitted expressions of interest in the project were to be invited to participate in a competitive dialogue; these were BAM UK, IMCD (Sir Robert McAlpine, Iridium Concesiones de Infraestructuras and Carillion) and New Borders Railway (Fluor, Miller and Uberior Infrastructure Investments).[33] In mid-November 2010, the withdrawal of Fluor resulted in the third consortium pulling out of the bidding process.[42] The second consortium withdrew in June 2011 following the decision by Carillion not to continue.[43] This led to the cancellation of the tender procedure by Scottish transport minister Keith Brown.[39][44] Network Rail was chosen by Transport Scotland to undertake the project and, following months of negotiations, a Transfer of Responsibility was signed at a ceremony held on 6 November 2012 at the Scottish Mining Museum in Newtongrange.[39][45] Network Rail agreed to build the line by mid-2015 for £294 million, an increase on the estimated £230 million that the line was expected to cost and the £100 million that it was originally costed at in 2000.[39][45][46] This figure is also substantially more than the £189 million which Network Rail Chief Executive Iain Coucher agreed to build the line in late 2007 or early 2008.[47]

In December 2012, Network Rail appointed BAM Nuttall as its main contractor.[45] The Network Rail team which worked on the line was essentially the same as the one which delivered the Airdrie-Bathgate Rail Link in 2009.[48] A Network Rail spokesman confirmed that lessons learned from the previous project had been applied to the Borders project, such as better coordination between the different teams by having them together in one office in Newtongrange.[48] In June 2013, the design contract for the line was awarded to URS which agreed to design new bridges, stations and roads, as well as the refurbishment of existing bridges and the provision of engineering support, for £3.5 million.[49]

Project specifications[]

File:Geograph-4213911-by-M-J-Richardson.jpg

Newly built viaduct over Hardengreen roundabout, October 2014

The line comprises Template:Convert of single-line track over a distance of Template:Convert, plus 42 new bridges, 95 refurbished bridges and two refurbished tunnels, and required 1.5 million tonnes of earth to be moved.[50][51][52] Stations are provided at Stow, Galashiels, Tweedbank, Newtongrange, Shawfair, Eskbank and Gorebridge.[39] According to Network Rail, the line was not suitable for double track and, in any event, there was no business case for doubling the line from the outset.[50] As a result, Template:Convert of the line are single-track with three "dynamic" passing loops providing Template:Convert of double-track to allow for half-hourly services.[19][50][51] The route is not electrified but provision has been made to install overhead line if required as bridges have been built to W12 gauge.[50][53] Although certain sections of the line are designed for speeds of up to Template:Convert, average speeds over the whole line are in the region of Template:Convert.[54]

Amongst the line's 27 substantial structures, the greatest engineering challenge was posed by the point where the track met the Edinburgh City Bypass. At that point, a tunnel had to be constructed under the A720 road while it had been temporarily diverted; in total, the project incorporated five new associated road schemes.[50][55] Major challenges were also posed by abandoned mine shafts to the north of the route, some of which dated to the 16th century and had not been mapped.[50] More than 200 bridges were involved in the scheme, as the route crosses the Gala Water and River Tweed nineteen times.[45][55] One of the most vital bridges on the line carries the track over Hardengreen roundabout on the A7, and required extensive works throughout 2013.[56] Other works included digging out an infilled cutting on the outskirts of Galashiels and reconstructing a nearby bridge to allow the line to pass under power lines.[52][55]

Works commence[]

The first sod was turned at Galashiels on 3 March 2010, when Scottish transport minister Stewart Stevenson attended a ceremony in the presence of campaigner Madge Elliot.[57] This triggered a clause in the 2006 Waverley Railway Act, which committed the Scottish Government to complete the line to Tweedbank once works had been commenced.[58]

Construction began in earnest on 18 April 2013 after completion of remedial and preparatory works such as land acquisition, removal of vegetation, demolition of certain structures and remedial works on old mines in Midlothian, for which over £54 million was spent by Network Rail.[39][59] The first task was the excavation of the track alignment through Monktonhall and the clearing of the site for Shawfair station.[59] Construction of the line's first bridge, Rye Haugh Bridge at Millerhall,[55] were underway on 6 August 2013 as part of works to deviate the line out of Edinburgh from Newcraighall before it returns to the original alignment.[60] The 23-arch Newbattle Viaduct (or Lothianbridge Viaduct) was used by lorries removing spoil from the construction site which eased traffic on local roads.[60]

File:Geograph-4264592-by-Walter-Baxter.jpg

Preparations for track-laying at Bowshank Tunnel, November 2014

The first track was laid in the Bowshank Tunnel on 4 April 2014.[11] On 30 September 2014, the first train on the Waverley Route for 45 years – a works train – ran to Newcraighall.[11] Tracklaying began in earnest on 6 October 2014, although preliminary works had resulted in a section of slab track laid through Bowshank Tunnel, south of Stow, as well as ballasting along large sections of the route and pre-cast switch and crossing units for the passing loops.[61] The first part of the route to be ballasted was the section through Lothianbridge Viaduct to which structural repairs had to be carried out.[55] By the end of October, more than Template:Convert of track had been laid as far as Tynehead and the double-track on the Shawfair loop had been completed plus Template:Convert of the second track on the Borthwick loop.[62] Work was halted in late November 2014 after a contractor working for BAM Nuttall in the Gala area was injured when a sleeper came loose when being lifted into position and landed on his leg.[63] Work restarted on 12 January 2015 following a review by BAM of their track installation methodology.[63] By 3 February, the track was complete through Galashiels and hundreds of spectators turned out to welcome the first train into the station since 1969, which was hauled by GBRf Class 66761 and 66741.[9]

Completion[]

File:Royal opening of the Borders Railway, 9 September 2015.jpg

Queen Elizabeth II was carried to Tweedbank aboard a train hauled by no. 60009 Union of South Africa on 9 September 2015, shown here south of Bowshank Tunnel.

On 5 February 2015, Network Rail's tracklaying machine reached the end of the line at Tweedbank station where a large crowd had gathered.[64][65] As there was not enough track for the train to complete tracklaying into the second platform, it had to return the next day.[64] The formal completion took place on 12 February when Keith Brown clipped the final length of rail into place.[64][66] During the period of construction, more than 1,000 rails were laid across 90,000 sleepers.[64] With the infrastructure complete, attention was turned to the installation of signalling and communications equipment as well as finalising the stations.[67] A GSM-R system controlled from the IECC next to Edinburgh Waverley was in place by April 2015.[66]

On 13 May 2015, the first test train, DRS Class 37 604 with DBSO 9702, worked the 1Q13 Tweedbank-Millerhill.[68][69][70] On 4 June 2015, a ceremony was held at Edinburgh Waverley to mark the final stages of the completion of works during which Madge Elliot, a veteran campaigner and founder member of the Campaign for Borders Rail, had Class 66 528 renamed in her honour.[71][72] Official completion and handover of the line to the ScotRail Alliance, a group formed by Network Rail and Abellio ScotRail, took place on 14 June 2015.[73] A 12-week period of driver training for 64 drivers and 64 guards began on 7 June 2015,[72][74][75][76] with Abellio ScotRail Class 170 170414 in livery promoting the new line undertaking a proving run to measure stepping distances from platforms to trains.[77] The train, which carried a large number of Network Rail staff, stopped at all stations from Newcraighall to Tweedbank in the presence of large crowds of spectators.[77] The following day Class 158 158741 was used for the first driver-training runs.[77] On 26 July 2015, a driver-training train carried Borders rail campaigner Madge Elliot.[78] The Borders Railway was named the Scottish infrastructure project of 2016 by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.[79]

Opening[]

Regular passenger services began on 6 September 2015 when the 08:45 Tweedbank - Edinburgh Waverley departed formed of two-car ScotRail Class 158s led by 158701.[80] On the first day more than 2,500 journeys were made.[80] A special VIP press trip had run on 4 September which left Edinburgh Waverley at 10:20 for Tweedbank.[81]

The railway was officially opened by Queen Elizabeth II on 9 September 2015.[82][83][84] Her Majesty travelled with the Duke of Edinburgh and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon on LNER Class A4 4488 Union of South Africa in the presence of its owner, John Cameron.[85] The locomotive hauled a rake of Mark 1s provided by the SRPS as well as Pullman car No. 310 Pegasus.[85] Due to bad weather, the Queen's helicopter journey from Balmoral was delayed which resulted in the late departure of the train and a delay at Newcraighall while a ScotRail service cleared the single-line section to the south.[85] Her Majesty alighted at Newtongrange to unveil a plaque marking the opening of the railway; a second plaque was unveiled at Tweedbank.[85] The following day the LNER Class A4 commenced a six-week programme of Borders steam specials promoted by ScotRail which saw services run to Tweedbank for three days each week.[85][86] Around 6,200 passengers were carried on the 17 fully booked services.[87]

During its first month of operations, 125,971 passengers travelled on the Borders Railway.[88] Demand was far in excess of what ScotRail had expected, with the line carrying 19.4% of its predicted annual patronage of 650,000 in one month.[88] The unexpected level of patronage resulted in overcrowding on services and passengers unable to board at intermediate stations, leading ScotRail to run four or six carriages with morning and peak trains.[88] ScotRail also leased additional parking space near Tweedbank station as the 235-space car park provided was generally full before 9am.[88] The National Mining Museum near Newtongrange station reported a hike in visitor numbers, while the nearby towns of Melrose and St Boswells confirmed a rise in business and tourism.[88]

Route details[]

Line characteristics[]

File:Lothianbridge viaduct01 2000-05-28.jpg

Newbattle Viaduct prior to refurbishment, May 2000

The line begins at Newcraighall South Junction where the track veers off the former Waverley Route to a parallel alignment just to the west which crosses over the former Monktonhall Colliery, part of the Midlothian Coalfield.[19][48][89] The first of three double-track dynamic loops begins here and continues for Template:Convert to King's Gate Junction just beyond the Edinburgh Bypass.[19][90] The new alignment - some Template:Convert to the south-west of the original route - avoids new roads and mining subsidence on the Waverley Route trackbed through Millerhill, whilst also serving new housing at Shawfair.[19][90] There is a maximum speed limit on the Shawfair loop of Template:Convert, with restrictions of Template:Convert at the northern entrance to the loop and Template:Convert at King's Gate.[90] A new bridge carries the Edinburgh bypass across the double-track.[19] The Waverley Route is rejoined at King's Gate where it becomes single-track for Template:Convert through Eskbank, Newtongrange and Gorebridge.[19]

Immediately after Eskbank, Hardengreen viaduct, an Template:Convert concrete span bridge, carries the line over the A7 road at Hardenbridge, thereby correcting the damage caused by the Dalkeith Western Bypass.[90][91] Thereafter Glenesk viaduct crosses the River North Esk, a single-arch span built for the Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway between 1829 and 1831, which is one of Scotland's oldest railway bridges.[90][91] This is soon followed by the 23-arch Newbattle Viaduct between Eskbank and Newtongrange, where the single-track runs down the centre of the structure as is the case for the Ribblehead Viaduct on the Settle-Carlisle Line.[91] The second double-track section begins at Fushiebridge Junction and continues for Template:Convert to just beyond the site of Tynehead station.[90][92] A Template:Convert single-track section then extends as far as Falahill where a Template:Convert reinforced concrete box takes the line under the A7, the original alignment having been lost to allow the road to be straightened across the trackbed.[93] The realignment at Falahill as well as the installation of single-track on a wider double-track alignment has allowed higher line speeds to be reached here than was possible on the Waverley Route; whereas the curvature of old alignment limited the line speed to Template:Convert, the new line has seen units reach Template:Convert.[94] The speed limit for the next Template:Convert to Galabank Junction is Template:Convert with a Template:Convert restriction at the halfway point.[94] The limit is raised to Template:Convert for Template:Convert south of Tynehead, although this speed is unlikely to be reached in practice due to the gradient and the short distance involved.[94]

File:170414 at Tweedbank.jpg

Class 170 at Tweedbank, June 2015

The final section of double-track begins at Galabank Junction on the approach to Stow where a Template:Convert loop is entered by a Template:Convert turnout before proceeding through several reverse curves and the Template:Convert Bowshank Tunnel to reach Bowland Points.[53][94] The speed limit drops from Template:Convert to Template:Convert through Bowland.[95] The last Template:Convert stretch to Galashiels and Tweedbank is entirely single-track save for the approach to Tweedbank.[53] The Template:Convert Torwoodlee Tunnel is traversed just before Galashiels and four river crossings are made in under Template:Convert which required new bridge spans.[53] At Galashiels, due to trackbed encroachment, the line deviates eastwards between a steep bank and the side wall of a supermarket which occupies the former station site.[96] For the final Template:Convert to Tweedbank, the line follows its original alignment over a reconstructed embankment and through an excavated cutting before crossing the River Tweed on the Category B listed Redbridge Viaduct.[96]

In terms of gradients, the line proceeds on the level until Eskbank where it climbs to the summit at Falahill (880 feet above sea level) at a ruling gradient of 1 in 70 and then descends at a typical gradient of 1 in 150 into Galashiels and Tweedbank.[92][97][98] Falahill is the tenth highest standard gauge railway summit in Britain, just Template:Convert lower than Shap summit.[99] The Fushiebridge loop is on a 1 in 70 gradient and climbs southwards up the Borthwick Bank which had posed a challenge in the past for steam locomotives pulling heavy loads.[92]

Potential for further doubling exists around Newtongrange where passive provision has been made.[48][92] The line has seven sets of points, two for each of the three dynamic loops, and one at the Tweedbank terminus.[100]

Places served[]

File:Stow Station.jpg

Stow railway station – the old station building has been retained

The Template:Convert long route serves Tweedbank, Galashiels, Stow, Gorebridge, Newtongrange, Eskbank, Shawfair, Newcraighall, Brunstane and Edinburgh Waverley stations, with a total running time of 55 minutes for most services.[48][101] Certain services are slowed due to conflicts with other operators' services in the Edinburgh area.[48] None of the new stations are staffed, but ticket machines and train information have been provided.[9] All stations other than Galashiels have park and ride facilities; at Galashiels, the local council built a £5.2 million bus/rail interchange.[48][50][55][102] The station at Stow was a late addition to the scheme after lobbying by the Campaign for Borders Rail.[39] Campaigning also resulted in platforms at the line's Tweedbank terminus being extended to Template:Convert, so as to accommodate tourist charter trains of up to 10–12 carriages in length.[39][103] Passive provision has been made for the extension of all other station platforms from Template:Convert to Template:Convert.[92] Eskbank station is convenient for an Edinburgh College campus, as well as the Midlothian Community Hospital.[102]

Naming of the line[]

The first recorded use of the term Borders Railway to describe the reopened line was in a paper by the Corus Rail Consultancy in January 2004, entitled Delivering an innovative Borders Railway, which had been commissioned by the Waverley Route Trust.[31] Previously, the Edinburgh–Tweedbank line had been variously described as the Waverley Railway and the Borders Rail Link.[31] In mid-2014, Transport Scotland considered launching a competition for the public to submit their ideas for a name but the Scottish Borders Council was strongly opposed on the basis that Borders Railway had developed a strong brand identity.[104] The use of Waverley Line or Waverley Route for the line was considered historically inaccurate by the Council and the Campaign for Borders Rail since these names were only ever used for the whole of the original line as far as Carlisle.[104]

Patronage[]

The Transport Scotland Business Case for Borders Railway, published in November 2012, predicted that the total passenger return journeys made for the first year of operation would be 647,136.[105] In some cases these included extra journeys. This was broken down into Edinburgh Park (4,071), Haymarket (35,329), Edinburgh Waverley (220,533), Brunstane and Newcraighall combined (986), Shawfair (61,860), Eskbank (130,525), Newtongrange (52,918), Gorebridge (90,019), Stow (5,843), Galashiels (23,431) and Tweedbank (21,621).[106]

After the first month, the actual number of passengers was 125,971,[107] compared to the predicted annual total of around 650,000 return journeys, i.e. 1.3m single journeys.Template:Citation needed By 23 January 2016, 537,327 passengers had been carried on the line with weekly figures consistently showing over 20,000 journeys made.[105] Figures released on 31 May 2016 showed that 694,373 persons had been carried since 6 September 2015, an increase of 22% by reference to the predicted patronage.[108] Tweedbank station saw 183,918 journeys compared to a predicted 18,978, while Galashiels had 104,593 trips against a predicted 20,567.[108] However, Eskbank, Gorebridge and Shawfair recorded less than their predicted usage.[109] In September 2016, it was announced that one million passengers had been carried on the reopened line.[110]

The final figures for 2015/16 for each station were as follows: Brunstane (165,978), Newcraighall (224,026), Eskbank (128,298), Shawfair (13,202), Newtongrange (86,298), Gorebridge (59,304), Stow (39,656), Galashiels (213,760) and Tweedbank (300,602).[111]

Operation[]

Services[]

Timetabling[]

Monday to Saturday services are half-hourly in each direction until 20:00, with an hourly service provided after 20:00 and on Sundays.[112] The first weekday service departs at 05:20 from Tweedbank[113] with the last service leaving Edinburgh at 23:54. Departure times from Edinburgh are usually at 24 and 54 minutes past the hour, while from Tweedbank trains depart at 28 and 58 minutes past the hour; individual timings may vary by a minute or so.[113] The trains starting close to on the hour do not call at Stow except in the peaks and evenings; the Sunday service stops at Stow.[112] Most services operate between Edinburgh and Tweedbank except for a few morning peak services that continue to Glenrothes with Thornton via the Fife Circle Line and a few evening peak services that originate at Glenrothes with Thornton.[114]

According to the Scottish transport minister Keith Brown, the timetable allows charter train promoters to run special excursion services within the hourly evening and Sunday services.[103] Trains with 10:54, 12:54 and 14:24 departures from Edinburgh and 11:59, 13:59 and 15:28 departures from Tweedbank may be affected by scheduled steam trains.[51][83][113][115]

Rolling stock[]

The route is operated by the new ScotRail franchisee, Abellio ScotRail, which took control in April 2015.[51] Class 158 DMUs are used on the line, one of the class 170 trains bear the special livery advertising the tourist attractions of the Borders.[51] Network Rail indicated that three-car trains run initially, with the possibility of six-car formations using Class 170s cascaded from the Glasgow to Edinburgh via Falkirk Line once that route has been electrified.[51] When, in 2013, vacancies were published for 18 trainee train driver positions at the planned Tweedbank depot, interest was substantial with 2,229 applications made for the posts.[34]

From 2018, Class 170s will become the primary unit on the line.[116] These will operate a new 3-coach hourly service to Fife.[116]

Fares[]

Initial plans announced in February 2014 indicated an end-to-end fare of less than £10 and stipulated an average fare across the Borders Railway working out at just £3.50.[115] According to the fare structure published by Abellio ScotRail in June 2015, the adult single fare between Edinburgh and Tweedbank was given as £10.00,[117] while the adult anytime day return is £16 or £11.20 off-peak.[77] In early 2014, the new fares were published as follows. [118]

fares Tweedbank Galashiels Stow Gorebridge Newtongrange Eskbank Shawfair Newcraighall Brunstane Waverley
Galashiels £1.80
Stow £3.20 £1.80
Gorebridge £5.90 £5.30 £2.80
Newtongrange £6.50 £6.10 £4.60 £2.00
Eskbank £7.00 £6.50 £5.10 £2.40 £1.70
Shawfair £7.20 £6.90 £5.70 £3.00 £2.20 £1.50
Newcraighall £8.30 £7.90 £6.40 £3.80 £3.10 £2.60 £1.10
Brunstane £8.80 £8.30 £6.90 £4.30 £3.50 £3.10 £2.00 £1.30
Waverley £9.80 £9.10 £7.70 £5.20 £4.60 £4.30 £3.20 £2.40 £2.40
Haymarket £9.80 £9.10 £7.70 £5.20 £4.60 £4.30 £3.20 £2.40 £2.40 £2.10

Community rail partnership[]

With the launching of the railway, a community rail partnership was formed.[119]

Project benefits[]

Speaking in November 2012, Scottish transport minister Keith Brown predicted that the Borders Railway would bring inward investment into local communities as well as £33 million of benefits for the wider Scottish economy.[45] The construction phase itself would support 400 jobs and would act as a catalyst to increased business development and housing as the area became within commuting distance of Edinburgh.[45] Car journeys would be reduced by 60,000 peak trips per year, which would reduce carbon emissions and alleviate traffic and accidents on the A7 and A68 roads.[45] The housing prediction came to pass when, as reported in the Edinburgh Evening News on 5 August 2013, a housing boom had been triggered along the line, with the number of new houses in Midlothian having doubled in the previous year, many of which were located in proximity to the line's stations.[60] It is expected that 4,000 houses will be built in the Shawfair area in the next 25 years.[102] On 20 August 2014, Alex Salmond, then First Minister of Scotland, announced to a meeting with members of the Scottish Borders Council that he expected the railway to benefit the Scottish economy by millions of pounds and that a feasibility study would be conducted to identify ways in which the line could boost tourism in the Borders region.[51]

Research by the Moffat Centre for Travel and Tourism Business Development has shown that visitor numbers for Midlothian and Borders tourist attractions increased by 4% and 6.9% respectively during the first seven months of 2016, while Abbotsford House, Sir Walter Scott's former home near Melrose, saw a significant revival in its fortunes as it reported a 12% rise in visits during 2016.[110][120]

Criticism[]

File:Galabank Junction.jpg

Class 158 entering the passing loop at Galabank Junction

Infrastructure capability[]

The line's construction has been described as resembling a "basic railway" built to a tight budget and incorporating a number of cost-saving features.[15] This is in contrast to the reopened Airdrie-Bathgate Rail Link, which was built as a double-track electrified railway from the outset.[15] The difference between the two lines has been claimed by commentators to reflect scepticism toward the Borders Railway, which has existed since proposals were first made in the 1990s, as well as a reluctance to allow the project to become too ambitious.[15] In particular, a 2011 cost-cutting exercise by Transport Scotland resulted in a new project specification which reduced the dynamic passing loops from their planned length of Template:Convert, and failed to future-proof the line by providing for all eight road bridges to be built to single-track width only, including the five bridges on the section between Tynehead and Stow where there were otherwise no other obstacles to doubling of the line.[121]

Similarly, key underbridges on the section as far as Gorebridge were also built to single-track only, notably Bridges 16a and 24a over the A7 at Hardengreen and Gore Glen.[122] This was in contrast to the quality of local roads built over the new line, including the A720, which is wider than required to accommodate possible extra road lanes.[122] A press release by BAM Nuttall indicated that, in addition to the Template:Convert of new line, the Borders Railway project was funding Template:Convert of new roads.[122] It was later revealed that these late changes to the rail infrastructure were insisted upon by Network Rail to ensure that the project remained on budget and on time.[123]

In addition, the lack of a siding anywhere on the line could make it difficult for rescue locomotives to recover a broken-down train without causing widespread disruption.[124][125]

These fears were to prove justified as, during the line's first month of operation, there were a number of well-publicised problems ranging from overcrowding resulting in passengers standing for the whole journey to timekeeping difficulties due to excessive dwell times at stations.[85] Furthermore, signalling problems led to disruption on the line nearly a month after opening.[126]

Timetabling[]

Whilst the Campaign for Borders Rail acknowledged that the half-hourly weekday stopping service would be useful for commuters, it questions whether this is the best use of a line, which could carry other types of traffic.[54] The organisation had proposed a two-tier service, whereby both a half-hourly stopping train and an hourly limited express service would continue north of Gorebridge.[54]

Failure to continue to Melrose[]

The Scott Wilson Report did not consider extending the line beyond Tweedbank due to the increased capital and operating costs of continuing further without a corresponding increase in passenger demand.[127] The Campaign for Borders Rail consider nevertheless that there would have been a strong case for reaching Melrose on the basis of the town's role in Borders tourism.[54]

Overcrowding[]

Since the opening of the Borders Railway, there have been many complaints about lack of seats, provision of ticket machines and lack of parking, especially at Tweedbank. The high demand has led ScotRail to increase some services to three or four carriage trains. However this and the general opening of the line have also contributed to there being a general shortage of train carriages across the ScotRail network, leading to them hiring extra trains.[128][129]

Service performance[]

The Campaign for Borders Rail claimed in February 2016 that only 35½% of services were arriving on time at Tweedbank, which made the Borders Railway one of ScotRail's most poorly-performing services.[105] In addition, reliability issues with the Class 158 units and traincrew problems resulted in at least one train being cancelled on 74 of the 143 days between 31 March 2016 and 20 August 2016.[130] This comprised 14 days of severe disruption due to crew shortages, 18 days as a result of issues with the Class 158s and nine days for signalling failures.[130] Crew shortages came about due to higher than expected levels of sickness as well as the difficulty of replacing staff during a popular period for annual leave.[130][131] Reliability issues with the Class 158s were encountered during hot weather which caused radiators to overheat, particularly on steep gradients with a heavy load, as coolant systems became stressed.[130][131] To deal with the problem, ScotRail sought to replace the faulty radiators with superior quality models.[130] Signalling problems were mainly due to water ingress into axle counters as well as a faulty telecommunications link coupled with a failure on the part of the automated fault-finding system to detect the problem locations.[130]

Extending the line[]

Proposals[]

The Campaign for Borders Rail has called for the continuation of the line to Melrose and Hawick, and eventually to Carlisle.[59][132] According to the group, Hawick suffered more than any other town in the Borders from the closure of the Waverley Route, and only the return of the railway could halt the area's economic decline.[133] At the time of the closure of the Waverley Route, Hawick was a 70-minute journey from Edinburgh.[96] At Melrose, the southbound station platform and building exist alongside the Melrose Bypass.[96] Network Rail has confirmed that there is nothing to prevent the extension of the line beyond Tweedbank,[50] although commentators have remarked that the Bypass could pose problems.[48] A major realignment of the road would be required, as well as the reinstatement of embankments and bridges.[96]

Support for the reconstruction of the Template:Convert to Carlisle was given by Alex Salmond, then First Minister of Scotland, in April 2014.[134] The comment was given as part of a speech in Carlisle in the run-up to the Scottish independence referendum.[134] Reinstating the line would not only provide an opportunity to access the vast areas of forestry land around Kielder, but also provide a strategic diversionary route in the event of closure of the East Coast or West Coast Main Lines.[102] Calls for the line's reopening have also come from the House of Commons Scottish Affairs Select Committee.[135] Transport Scotland has ruled out a Template:Convert extension of the line from Tweedbank to Hawick in favour of connecting bus services and improved cycling and walking routes.[55]

In May 2013, it was reported that Heriot-Watt University had been asked by Midlothian Council to carry out a feasibility study on a Template:Convert rail link connecting Penicuik with the Borders Railway.[136] At least Template:Convert of the new line would follow the Edinburgh, Loanhead and Roslin Railway, the alignment of which is generally intact between Millerhill and Straiton.[136]

Feasibility study[]

In June 2015, the Scottish Infrastructure Minister Keith Brown confirmed that talks were underway on the commissioning of a feasibility study for an extension to Hawick and Carlisle.[137] Fergus Ewing, Tourism Minister, stated in July 2015 that he would not rule out a further extension, describing the line as "one of the most exciting and most effective events and transport services that there has ever been for tourism".[138]

In September 2016, the Minister for Transport and the Islands, Humza Yousaf, announced that Transport Scotland would report by the end of 2017 on the case for extending the Borders Railway as part of a strategic transport projects review.[139] One of the options to be considered will be routing the line to Carlisle via Langholm instead of following the original course of the Waverley Route through Newcastleton.[110][140]

References[]

  1. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  2. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  3. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  4. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  5. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  6. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  7. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  8. ↑ Template:Cite book
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 Template:Cite magazine
  10. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Template:Cite magazine
  12. ↑ Template:Cite book
  13. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  14. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 15.2 15.3 15.4 15.5 15.6 Template:Cite magazine
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  17. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  18. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5 19.6 19.7 19.8 19.9 Template:Harvnb
  20. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  21. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  22. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  23. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  24. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 Template:Harvnb
  26. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Template:Harvnb
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 Template:Harvnb
  29. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  30. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  31. ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 Template:Harvnb
  32. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  33. ↑ 33.0 33.1 33.2 Template:Harvnb
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 Template:Harvnb
  35. ↑ 35.0 35.1 35.2 Template:Harvnb
  36. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  37. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  38. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 39.5 39.6 39.7 Template:Cite magazine
  40. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  41. ↑ 41.0 41.1 41.2 Template:Harvnb
  42. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  43. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  44. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 45.4 45.5 45.6 Template:Harvnb
  46. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  47. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  48. ↑ 48.0 48.1 48.2 48.3 48.4 48.5 48.6 48.7 Template:Cite magazine
  49. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  50. ↑ 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 50.5 50.6 50.7 Template:Cite magazine
  51. ↑ 51.0 51.1 51.2 51.3 51.4 51.5 51.6 Template:Cite magazine
  52. ↑ 52.0 52.1 Template:Harvnb
  53. ↑ 53.0 53.1 53.2 53.3 Template:Harvnb
  54. ↑ 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 Template:Harvnb
  55. ↑ 55.0 55.1 55.2 55.3 55.4 55.5 55.6 Template:Cite magazine
  56. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  57. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  58. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  59. ↑ 59.0 59.1 59.2 Template:Cite magazine
  60. ↑ 60.0 60.1 60.2 Template:Cite magazine
  61. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  62. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  63. ↑ 63.0 63.1 Template:Cite magazine
  64. ↑ 64.0 64.1 64.2 64.3 Template:Cite magazine
  65. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  66. ↑ 66.0 66.1 Template:Harvnb
  67. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  68. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  69. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  70. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  71. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  72. ↑ 72.0 72.1 Template:Cite magazine
  73. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  74. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  75. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  76. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  77. ↑ 77.0 77.1 77.2 77.3 Template:Cite magazine
  78. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  79. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  80. ↑ 80.0 80.1 Template:Cite magazine
  81. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  82. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  83. ↑ 83.0 83.1 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  84. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  85. ↑ 85.0 85.1 85.2 85.3 85.4 85.5 Template:Cite magazine
  86. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  87. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  88. ↑ 88.0 88.1 88.2 88.3 88.4 Template:Cite magazine
  89. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  90. ↑ 90.0 90.1 90.2 90.3 90.4 90.5 Template:Harvnb
  91. ↑ 91.0 91.1 91.2 Template:Harvnb
  92. ↑ 92.0 92.1 92.2 92.3 92.4 Template:Harvnb
  93. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  94. ↑ 94.0 94.1 94.2 94.3 Template:Harvnb
  95. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  96. ↑ 96.0 96.1 96.2 96.3 96.4 Template:Harvnb
  97. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  98. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  99. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  100. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  101. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  102. ↑ 102.0 102.1 102.2 102.3 Template:Harvnb
  103. ↑ 103.0 103.1 Template:Cite magazine
  104. ↑ 104.0 104.1 Template:Harvnb
  105. ↑ 105.0 105.1 105.2 Template:Cite magazine
  106. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  107. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  108. ↑ 108.0 108.1 Template:Cite magazine
  109. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  110. ↑ 110.0 110.1 110.2 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  111. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  112. ↑ 112.0 112.1 Template:Cite magazine
  113. ↑ 113.0 113.1 113.2 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  114. ↑ Tweedbank arrivals & departures Real Train Times
  115. ↑ 115.0 115.1 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  116. ↑ 116.0 116.1 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  117. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  118. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  119. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  120. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  121. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  122. ↑ 122.0 122.1 122.2 Template:Harvnb
  123. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  124. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  125. ↑ Template:Cite episode
  126. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  127. ↑ Template:Harvnb
  128. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  129. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  130. ↑ 130.0 130.1 130.2 130.3 130.4 130.5 Template:Cite magazine
  131. ↑ 131.0 131.1 Template:Cite magazine
  132. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  133. ↑ Template:Cite magazine
  134. ↑ 134.0 134.1 Template:Cite magazine
  135. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  136. ↑ 136.0 136.1 Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  137. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  138. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  139. ↑ Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
  140. ↑ Template:Cite magazine

External links[]

Template:External media Template:Commons category

Template:Railway lines in Scotland Template:Transport in Edinburgh

Template:Coord

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
Advertisement

Fan Feed

More YourStudent Gemini Wiki