An autonomous car,[1] also known as a driverless car,[2] self-driving car[3] or robot car,[4] is an autonomous vehicle capable of fulfilling the human transportation capabilities of a traditional car. As an autonomous vehicle, it is capable of sensing its environment and navigating without human input. Robotic cars exist mainly as prototypes and demonstration systems. Currently, the only self-driving vehicles that are commercially available are open-air shuttles for pedestrian zones that operate at Template:Convert.[5]

Autonomous vehicles sense their surroundings with such techniques as radar, lidar, GPS, and computer vision. Advanced control systems interpret sensory information to identify appropriate navigation paths, as well as obstacles and relevant signage.[6] Some autonomous vehicles update their maps based on sensory input, allowing the vehicles to keep track of their position even when conditions change or when they enter uncharted environments.

Some quasi-autonomous demonstration systems date back to the 1920s and the 1930s.[7] Since the 1980s, when Mercedes-Benz and Bundeswehr University Munich built a driverless car through the EUREKA Prometheus Project,[8] significant advances have been made in both technology and legislation relevant to autonomous cars. Numerous major companies and research organizations have developed working prototype autonomous vehicles, including Mercedes-Benz, General Motors, Continental Automotive Systems, Autoliv Inc., Bosch, Nissan, Toyota, Audi, Vislab from University of Parma, Oxford University and Google.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In 2010, four electric autonomous vans successfully drove 8000 miles from Italy to China. The vehicles were developed in a research project backed by European Union funding, by Vislab of the University of Parma, Italy.[15][16] In July 2013 Vislab worldpremiered BRAiVE, a vehicle that moved autonomously on a mixed traffic route open to public traffic.[17] As of 2013, four U.S. states have passed laws permitting autonomous cars: Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan.[18][19][20][21][22] In Europe, cities in Belgium, France and Italy are planning to operate transport systems for driverless cars.[23][24]


The term "autonomous" is not a generally accepted term in science when used to describe technical artefacts. For example Wood et al. (2012), see reference below, writes "This Article generally uses the term “autonomous,” instead of the term “automated.” We have chosen to use the term “autonomous” because it is the term that is currently in more widespread use (and thus is more familiar to the general public). However, the latter term is arguably more accurate. “Automated” connotes control or operation by a machine, while “autonomous” connotes acting alone or independently. Most of the vehicle concepts (that we are currently aware of) have a person in the driver’s seat, utilize a communication connection to the cloud or other vehicles, and do not independently select either destinations or routes for reaching them. Thus, the term “automated” would more accurately describe these vehicle concepts". Wood, S.P., Chang, J., Healy, T. & Wood, J. (2012). The potential regulatory challenges of increasingly autonomous motor vehicles. 52nd Santa Clara Law Review, 4, 9, pp. 1423–1502. See also

In the United States, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has established an official classification system:[25]

  • Level 0: The driver completely controls the vehicle at all times.
  • Level 1: Individual vehicle controls are automated, such as electronic stability control or automatic braking.
  • Level 2: At least two controls can be automated in unison, such as adaptive cruise control in combination with lane keeping.
  • Level 3: The driver can fully cede control of all safety-critical functions in certain conditions. The car senses when conditions require the driver to retake control and provides a "sufficiently comfortable transition time" for the driver to do so.
  • Level 4: The vehicle performs all safety-critical functions for the entire trip, with the driver not expected to control the vehicle at any time. This can include unoccupied cars.

Potential advantagesEdit

An increase in the use of autonomous cars would make possible such benefits as:

  • Fewer traffic collisions, due to an autonomous system's increased reliability and faster reaction time compared to human drivers.[26]
  • Increased roadway capacity and reduced traffic congestion (due to reduced need for safety gaps),[27][28] and the ability to better manage traffic flow.[26]
  • Relief of vehicle occupants from driving and navigation chores.[26]
  • Higher speed limit for autonomous cars.[29]
  • Removal of constraints on occupants' state – in an autonomous car, it would not matter if the occupants were under age, over age,[30] blind, distracted, intoxicated, or otherwise impaired.
  • Alleviation of parking scarcity, as cars could drop off passengers, park far away where space is not scarce, and return as needed to pick up passengers.
  • Elimination of redundant passengers – humans are not required to take the car anywhere, as the robotic car can drive independently to wherever it is required, such as to pick up passengers or to go in for maintenance. This would be especially relevant to trucks, taxis and car-sharing services.[28][31][32]
  • Reduction of space required for vehicle parking.[33]
  • Reduction in the need for traffic police and vehicle insurance.[34]
  • Reduction of physical road signage – autonomous cars could receive necessary communication electronically (although physical signs may still be required for any human drivers).[35][36][37]
  • Smoother ride.[38]

Potential obstaclesEdit

In spite of the various benefits to increased vehicle automation, some foreseeable challenges persist:

  • Liability for damage.[39]
  • Resistance for individuals to forfeit control of their cars.[40]
  • Software reliability.[41]
  • Cyber Security: A car's computer could potentially be compromised, as could a communication system between cars.[42]
  • Implementation of legal framework and establishment of government regulations for self-driving cars.[43]
  • Reliance on autonomous drive produces less experienced drivers for when manual drive is needed.[44]
  • Loss of driver-related jobs.[45] Reduced demand for parking services and for accident related services (Emergency rooms, Injury Lawyers, collision repair, etc.) assuming increased vehicle safety. Reduction in jobs relating to auto insurance and traffic police.[34][46]
  • Loss of privacy.[47]
  • Autonomous cars relying on lane markings cannot decipher faded, missing, or incorrect lane markings. Markings covered in snow, or old lane markings left visible can hinder autonomous cars ability to stay in lane.[48]


File:Vehicle detector 1957.jpg
File:Street intersection Futarama.jpg
File:General Motors exhibit at Century 21 Exposition, 1962.jpg


In 1925, Houdina Radio Control demonstrated the radio-controlled driverless car "linrrican Wonder" at New York City streets, traveling up Broadway and down Fifth Avenue through the thick of the traffic jam. The linrrican Wonder was a 1926 Chandler that was equipped with a transmitting antennae on the tonneau and was operated by a second car that followed it and sent out radio impulses which were caught by the transmitting antennae. The antennae introduced the signals to a circuit- breakers which operated small electric motors that directed every movement of the car. Achen Motor, a distributor of cars in Milwaukee and surrounding territory, used Francis' invention under the name "Phantom Auto" and demonstrated it in December 1926 at the streets of Milwaukee.[50] It was demonstrated again in June 1932 at the streets of Fredericksburg as a feature attraction of Bigger Bargain Day in which most of the merchants of the city were participating.[51]


An early representation of the autonomous car was Norman Bel Geddes's Futurama exhibit sponsored by General Motors at the 1939 World's Fair, which depicted electric cars powered by circuits embedded in the roadway and controlled by radio.[7]


In 1953, RCA Labs successfully built a miniature car that was guided and contolled by wires that were laid in a pattern on a laboratory floor. The system sparked the imagination of Leland M. Hancock, traffic engineer in the Nebraska Department of Roads, and of his director, L. N. Ress, state engineer. The decision was made to experiment with the system in actual highway installations. In 1958, a full size system was successfully demonstrated by RCA Labs and the State of Nebraska on a 400-foot strip of public highway just outside Lincoln, Neb. A series of experimental detector circuits buried in the pavement were a series of lights along the edge of the road. The detector circuits were able to send impulses to guide the car and determine the presence and velocity of any metallic vehicle on its surface. It was developed in collaboration with General Motors, who paired two standard models with equipment consisting of special radio receivers and audible and visual warning devices that were able to simulate automatic steering, accelerating and brake control. It was further demonstrated on 5 June 1960, at RCA Lab's headquarter in Princeton, New Jersey, where reporters were allowed to "drive" on the cars. Commercialization of the system was expected to happen by 1975.[52][53] Also during the 1950s throughout the 1960s, General Motors showcased the Firebirds, a series of experimental cars that were described to have an "electronic guide system can rush it over an automatic highway while the driver relaxes".


In 1960, Ohio State University's Communication and Control Systems Laboratory launched a project to develop driverless cars which were activated by electronic devices imbedded in the roadway. Head of the project, Dr. Robert L. Cosgriff, claimed in 1966 that the system could be ready for installation on a public road in 15 years.[54]

In the early 1960s, the Bureau of Public Roads considered the construction of an experimental electronically-controlled highway. Four states - Ohio, Massachusetts, New York and California - were bidding for the construction.[55]

During the 1960s, the United Kingdom's Transport and Road Research Laboratory tested a driverless Citroen DS that interacted with magnetic cables that were embedded in the road. It went through a test track at Template:Convert without deviation of speed or direction in any weather conditions, and in a far more effective way than by human control. Research continued in the '70s with cruise control devices activated by signals in the cabling beneath the tracks. According to cost benefit analyses that were made, adoption of system on the British motorways would been repaid by end of the century, increase the road capacity by at least 50% and prevent around 40% of the accidents. Funding for these experiments was withdrawn by the mid-1970s.[56][57][58]

Also during the 1960s and the 1970s, Bendix Corporation developed and tested autonomous cars that were powered and controlled by buried cables, with wayside communicators relaying computer messages.


In the 1980s, a vision-guided Mercedes-Benz robotic van, designed by Ernst Dickmanns and his team at the Bundeswehr University Munich in Munich, Germany, achieved a speed of Template:Convert on streets without traffic.[8] Subsequently, EUREKA conducted the Template:Currency Prometheus Project on autonomous vehicles from 1987 to 1995.

In the same decade, the DARPA-funded Autonomous Land Vehicle (ALV) project in the United States made use of new technologies developed by Carnegie Mellon University, the Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Martin Marietta and SRI International. The ALV project achieved the first road-following demonstration that used laser radar, computer vision and autonomous robotic control to direct a robotic vehicle at speeds of up to Template:Convert. In 1987, HRL Laboratories (formerly Hughes Research Labs) demonstrated the first off-road map and sensor-based autonomous navigation on the ALV. The vehicle traveled over Template:Convert at Template:Convert on complex terrain with steep slopes, ravines, large rocks, and vegetation.


In 1991, the United States Congress passed the ISTEA Transportation Authorization bill, which instructed USDOT to "demonstrate an automated vehicle and highway system by 1997." The Federal Highway Administration took on this task, first with a series of Precursor Systems Analsyes and then by establishing the National Automated Highway System Consortium (NAHSC). This cost-shared project was led by FHWA and General Motors, with Caltrans, Delco, Parsons Brinkerhoff, Bechtel, UC-Berkeley, Carnegie Mellon University, and Lockheed Martin as additional partners. Extensive systems engineering work and research culminated in Demo '97 on I-15 in San Diego, California, in which about 20 automated vehicles, including cars, buses, and trucks, were demonstrated to thousands of onlookers, attracting extensive media coverage. The demonstrations involved close-headway platooning intended to operate in segregated traffic, as well as "free agent" vehicles intended to operate in mixed traffic. Other carmakers were invited to demonstrate their systems, such that Toyota and Honda also participated. While the subsequent aim was to produce a system design to aid commercialization, the program was cancelled in the late 1990s due to tightening research budgets at USDOT. Overall funding for the program was in the range of $90 million.[59]

In 1994, the twin robot vehicles VaMP and Vita-2 of Daimler-Benz and Ernst Dickmanns of UniBwM drove more than Template:Convert on a Paris three-lane highway in standard heavy traffic at speeds up to Template:Convert, albeit semi-autonomously with human interventions. They demonstrated autonomous driving in free lanes, convoy driving, and lane changes with autonomous passing of other cars.Template:Citation needed That same year, Lucas Industries developed parts for a semi-autonomous car in a project that was funded by Jaguar Cars, Lucas, and the UK Department of Trade and Industry.[60]

In 1995, Dickmanns' re-engineered autonomous S-Class Mercedes-Benz undertook a Template:Convert journey from Munich in Bavaria, Germany to Copenhagen, Denmark and back, using saccadic computer vision and transputers to react in real time. The robot achieved speeds exceeding Template:Convert on the German Autobahn, with a mean time between human interventions of Template:Convert, or 95% autonomous driving. It drove in traffic, executing manoeuvres to pass other cars. Despite being a research system without emphasis on long distance reliability, it drove up to Template:Convert without human intervention.Template:Citation needed

In 1995, the Carnegie Mellon University Navlab project achieved 98.2% autonomous driving on a Template:Convert cross-country journey which was dubbed "No Hands Across America". This car, however, was semi-autonomous by nature: it used neural networks to control the steering wheel, but throttle and brakes were human-controlled.[61]

In 1996, (now Professor) Alberto Broggi of the University of Parma launched the ARGO Project, which worked on enabling a modified Lancia Thema to follow the normal (painted) lane marks in an unmodified highway.[62] The culmination of the project was a journey of Template:Convert over six days on the motorways of northern Italy dubbed Mille Miglia in Automatico ("One thousand automatic miles"), with an average speed of Template:Convert. The car operated in fully automatic mode for 94% of its journey, with the longest automatic stretch being Template:Convert. The vehicle had only two black-and-white low-cost video cameras on board and used stereoscopic vision algorithms to understand its environment.


The US Government funded three military efforts known as Demo I (US Army), Demo II (DARPA), and Demo III (US Army). Demo III (2001)[63] demonstrated the ability of unmanned ground vehicles to navigate miles of difficult off-road terrain, avoiding obstacles such as rocks and trees. James Albus at the National Institute for Standards and Technology provided the Real-Time Control System which is a hierarchical control system. Not only were individual vehicles controlled (e.g. throttle, steering, and brake), but groups of vehicles had their movements automatically coordinated in response to high level goals.

The ParkShuttle, a driverless public road transport system, became operational in the Netherlands in the early 2000s.[64] In January 2006, the United Kingdom's 'Foresight' think-tank revealed a report which predicts RFID-tagged driverless cars on UK's roads by 2056 and the Royal Academy of Engineering claimed that driverless trucks could be on Britain's motorways by 2019.[65][66]

Autonomous vehicles have also been used in mining. Since December 2008, Rio Tinto Alcan has been testing the Komatsu Autonomous Haulage System – the world's first commercial autonomous mining haulage system – in the Pilbara iron ore mine in Western Australia. Rio Tinto has reported benefits in health, safety, and productivity. In November 2011, Rio Tinto signed a deal to greatly expand its fleet of driverless trucks.[67] Other autonomous mining systems include Sandvik Automine's underground loaders and Caterpillar Inc.'s autonomous hauling.


Many major automotive manufacturers, including General Motors, Ford, Mercedes Benz, Volkswagen, Audi, Nissan, Toyota, BMW, and Volvo, are testing driverless car systems as of 2013. BMW has been testing driverless systems since around 2005,[68][69] while in 2010, Audi sent a driverless Audi TTS to the top of Pike’s Peak at close to race speeds.[10] In 2011, GM created the EN-V (short for Electric Networked Vehicle), an autonomous electric urban vehicle.[70] In 2012, Volkswagen began testing a "Temporary Auto Pilot" (TAP) system that will allow a car to drive itself at speeds of up to Template:Convert on the highway.[71] Ford has conducted extensive research into driverless systems and vehicular communication systems.[72] In January 2013, Toyota demonstrated a partially self-driving car with numerous sensors and communication systems.[12] Other programs in the field include the 2GetThere passenger vehicles from the Netherlands and the DARPA Grand Challenge in the USA; some plans for bimodal public transport systems include autonomous cars as a component.[73]

In 2010, Italy's VisLab from the University of Parma, led by Professor Alberto Broggi, ran the VisLab Intercontinental Autonomous Challenge (VIAC), a Template:Convert test run which marked the first intercontinental land journey completed by autonomous vehicles. Four driverless electric vans successfully completed the 100-day journey, leaving Parma, Italy, on 20 July 2010, and arriving at the Shanghai Expo in China on 28 October. The research project is co-funded by the European Union CORDIS program.[74]

In 2013, on July 12, VisLab conducted another pioneering test of autonomous vehicles, during which a robotic vehicle drove in downtown Parma with no human control, successfully navigating roundabouts, traffic lights, pedestrian crossings and other common hazards.[75]

In 2011, the Freie Universität Berlin developed two autonomous cars to drive in the innercity traffic of Berlin in Germany. Led by the AutoNOMOS group, the two vehicles Spirit of Berlin and MadeInGermany handled intercity traffic, traffic lights and roundabouts between International Congress Centrum and Brandenburg Gate. It was the first car licensed for autonomous driving on the streets and highways in the Germany and financed by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.[76]

In August 2013, Daimler R&D with Karlsruhe Institute of Technology/FZI, made a Mercedes-Benz S-class vehicle with close-to-production stereo cameras [77] and radars drive completely autonomously for about 100 km from Mannheim to Pforzheim, Germany, following the historic Bertha Benz Memorial Route.[78][79]

File:2014-03-04 Geneva Motor Show 1186.JPG

In August 2013 Nissan announced its plans to launch several driverless cars by 2020. The company is building in Japan a dedicated autonomous driving proving ground, to be completed in 2014. Nissan installed its autonomous car technology in a Nissan Leaf all-electric car for demonstration purposes. The car was demonstrated at Nissan 360 test drive event held in California in August 2013.[80][81] In September 2013, the Leaf fitted the prototype Advanced Driver Assistance System was granted a license plate that allows to drive it on Japanese public roads. The testing car will be used by Nissan engineers to evaluate how its in-house autonomous driving software performs in the real-world. Time spent on public roads will help refine the car’s software for fully-automated driving.[82] The autonomous Leaf was demonstrated on public roads for the first time at a media event held in Japan in November 2013. The Leaf drove on the Sagami Expressway in Kanagawa prefecture, near Tokyo. Nissan vice chairman Toshiyuki Shiga and the prefecture’s Governor, Yuji Kuroiwa, rode in the car during the test.[83][84]

Available in 2013, the 2014 Mercedes S-Class has options for autonomous steering, lane keeping, acceleration/braking, parking, accident avoidance, and driver fatigue detection, in both city traffic and highway speeds of up to Template:Convert per hour.[85][86][87][88]

Released in 2013, the 2014 Infiniti Q50 uses cameras, radar and other technology to deliver various lane-keeping, collision avoidance and cruise control features. One reviewer remarked, "With the Q50 managing its own speed and adjusting course, I could sit back and simply watch, even on mildly curving highways, for three or more miles at a stretch," adding that he wasn't touching the steering wheel or pedals.[89]

Although as of 2013, fully autonomous vehicles are not yet available to the public, many contemporary car models have features offering limited autonomous functionality. These include adaptive cruise control, a system that monitors distances to adjacent vehicles in the same lane, adjusting the speed with the flow of traffic; lane assist, which monitors the vehicle's position in the lane, and either warns the driver when the vehicle is leaving its lane, or, less commonly, takes corrective actions; and parking assist, which assists the driver in the task of parallel parking.[90]

In January 2014, Induct Technology's Navia shuttle became the first self-driving vehicle to be available for commercial sale.[5] Limited to Template:Convert, the open-air electric vehicle resembles a golf cart and seats up to eight people. It is intended to shuttle people around "pedestrianized city centers, large industrial sites, airports, theme parks, university campuses or hospital complexes."[91]

Official predictionsEdit

Major automobile manufacturers and technology companies have made numerous predictions for the development of autonomous car technology in the near future.

  • By 2014, Israeli company Mobileye expects to release semi-autonomous car technology.[92]
  • Late 2014, Volvo will feature Adaptive Cruise Control with steer assist which will automatically follow the vehicle ahead in queues.[93]
  • By 2015, Audi plans to market vehicles that can autonomously steer, accelerate and brake at lower speeds, such as in traffic jams.[94]
  • By 2015, Cadillac plans vehicles with "super cruise": autonomous steering, braking and lane guidance.[95] This technology will likely spread to other GM models in following years.[96]
  • By 2015, Nissan expects to sell vehicles with autonomous steering, braking, lane guidance, throttle, gear shifting, and, as permitted by law, unoccupied self-parking after passengers exit.[97]
  • By Mid-2010's, Toyota plans to roll out near-autonomous vehicles dubbed Automated Highway Driving Assist with Lane Trace Control and Cooperative-adaptive Cruise Control.[98]
  • In 2016, With a partnership with Mobileye, Tesla's automatic cars (95% Autonomous) would be available for purchase. Though it will only allow giving control to the cameras for limited periods.[99]
  • By 2016, Mobileye expects to release fully autonomous car technology.[92]
  • January 1, 2017 The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration hopes to mandate the adoption of Vehicle-to-Vehicle technology on all new automobiles.[100]
  • By 2018, Google expects to release their autonomous car technology.[101]
  • By 2020, Volvo envisages having cars in which passengers would be immune from injuries.[93]
  • By 2020, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Nissan and BMW all expect to sell autonomous cars.[102][103][104][105][106]
  • By 2025, Daimler and Ford expect autonomous vehicles on the market.[107][108]
  • In 2035, IHS Automotive report says will be the year most self-driving vehicles will be operated completely independent from a human occupant’s control.[109]

Semi-autonomous vehiclesEdit

Though not fully autonomous, there are features in which the vehicle will take control of itself for either safety or convenience purposes. In 2014, standard or widely available features in which the vehicle takes control include:

Lane keep with adaptive cruise controlEdit

Some vehicles combine adaptive cruise control with a system that keeps the vechicle in the lane (unless a turn signal is used). Lane keeping systems are limited to roads with visible, unfaded lane markings.

Requires driver control while vehicle is in use, but adjusts steering if vehicle detects itself drifting out of lane:

Year Make Model Standard/Optional
2013 Ford Explorer[110] Optional
Fusion [111]
Lincoln MKS[112]
Toyota Prius[114]
2014 Acura RLX[115] Optional
Ford Explorer[117]
Infiniti Q50[120]
Lincoln MKS[121]
Mercedes E-Class[124]
Toyota Prius[125]
2015 Ford Focus[126]

Unassisted driving for limited durations

Year Make Model Features
2014 Mercedes S-Class Options for autonomous steering, lane keeping, acceleration/braking, parking, accident avoidance, and driver fatigue detection, in both city traffic and highway speeds of up to Template:Convert per hour. Allows unassisted driving for 10 seconds at a time.[127]
2015 Mercedes C-Class Sign Recogniton (dash display), autonomous steering, lane keeping, adaptive cruise control, parking, and accident avoidance. Semi-autonomous traffic assistant for speeds up to 37 miles per hour.[128]


File:Driverless Car.png

In the United States, state vehicle codes generally do not envisage — but do not necessarily prohibit — highly automated vehicles.[129] To clarify the legal status of and otherwise regulate such vehicles, several states have enacted or are considering specific laws.[130] As of the end of 2013, four U.S. states, (Nevada, Florida, California, and Michigan) have successfully enacted laws addressing autonomous vehicles.

In June 2011, the Nevada Legislature passed a law to authorize the use of autonomous cars. Nevada thus became the first jurisdiction in the world where autonomous vehicles might be legally operated on public roads. The bill was signed into law by Nevada's Governor on 16 June 2011. According to the law, the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (NDMV) is responsible for setting safety and performance standards and the agency is responsible for designating areas where autonomous cars may be tested.[19][20][131] The law went into effect on 1 March 2012.[132] This legislation was supported by Google in an effort to legally conduct further testing of its Google driverless car.[21]

File:Jurvetson Google driverless car trimmed.jpg

The Nevada law defines an autonomous vehicle to be "a motor vehicle that uses artificial intelligence, sensors and global positioning system coordinates to drive itself without the active intervention of a human operator." The law also acknowledges that the operator will not need to pay attention while the car is operating itself. Google had further lobbied for an exemption from a ban on distracted driving to permit occupants to send text messages while sitting behind the wheel, but this did not become law.[21][133][134] Furthermore, Nevada's regulations require a person behind the wheel and one in the passenger’s seat during tests.[135]

In May 2012, the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) issued the first license for a self-driven car to a Toyota Prius modified with Google's experimental driverless technology.[132] Google's autonomous system permits a human driver to take control of the vehicle at any time by stepping on the brake or turning the wheel. License plates issued in Nevada for autonomous cars will have a red background and feature an infinity symbol () on the left side, which, according to the DMV Director, "was the best way to represent the 'car of the future'."[135]

On 1 July 2012, Florida became the second state to recognize the legality of autonomous vehicles. Florida's law clarifies that, "the State does not prohibit or specifically regulate the testing or operation of autonomous … vehicles on public roads."[136]

On 25 September 2012, California Governor Jerry Brown signed a bill allowing the legalization of driverless cars in the state of California which also requires the California Department of Motor Vehicles to draft regulations by 2015.[137] In California, proposed legislation would require that "the driver would still need to sit behind the wheel in case the robotic functions of the car suddenly fail and a real driver is needed", thus limiting the benefits that autonomous cars could provide to unlicensed drivers.[138]

In the 2013–2014 legislative session, Colorado and Michigan introduced legislation addressing the regulation of autonomous vehicles. Governor Rick Snyder signed legislation allowing the testing of automated or self-driving vehicles on Michigan’s roads in December 2013, but requires a human in the driver seat at all time while the vehicle is in use.[24] Colorado's proposed bill was rejected in committee in February 2013.[139]

In 2013, the government of the United Kingdom permitted the testing of autonomous cars on public roads.[140] Prior to this, all testing of robotic vehicles in the UK had been conducted on private property.[140]

Vehicular communication systemsEdit

Main article: Vehicular communication systems

Individual vehicles may benefit from information obtained from other vehicles in the vicinity, especially information relating to traffic congestion and safety hazards. Vehicular communication systems use vehicles and roadside units as the communicating nodes in a peer-to-peer network, providing each other with information. As a cooperative approach, vehicular communication systems can allow all cooperating vehicles to be more effective. According to a 2010 study by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, vehicular communication systems could help avoid up to 81 percent of all traffic accidents.Template:Citation needed

In 2012, computer scientists at the University of Texas in Austin began developing smart intersections designed for autonomous cars. The intersections will have no traffic lights and no stop signs, instead using computer programs that will communicate directly with each car on the road.[141]


  • Expert members of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) have estimated that up to 75% of all vehicles will be autonomous by 2040.[142]
  • Navigant Research forecasts that autonomous vehicles will gradually gain traction in the market over the coming two decades and by 2035, sales of autonomous vehicles will reach 95.4 million annually, representing 75% of all light-duty vehicle sales.[143]
  • ABI Research forecasts that truly self-driving cars would become a reality by 2020 and that 10 million such new cars would be rolling out on to United States' public highways every year by 2032.[144]
  • Columbia University's The Earth Institute forecasts the reduction of United State's fleet of vehicles by a factor of 10.[145]
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers forecasts a reduction of traffic accidents by a factor of 10 and it concludes that the fleet of vehicles in the United States may collapse from 245 million to just 2.4 million.[146]
  • KPMG LLP and the Center for Automotive Research (CAR) foresee improvements in productivity and energy efficiency as well as new business models.[147]

Public opinion surveysEdit

In a 2011 online survey of 2,006 consumers in the US and the UK conducted by Accenture, 49% of those surveyed said they would be comfortable using a "driverless car".[148] According to a 2012 survey of 17,400 vehicle owners conducted by J.D. Power and Associates, 37% of all survey responders initially said they would be interested in purchasing a fully autonomous car.[149] However, that figure dropped to 20% once they learned the technology would cost an additional $3,000. With an additional cost of $3,000, 25% of the male vehicle buyers were willing to pay for a fully autonomous vehicle, while only 14 percent of women wanted the feature.[149]

According to a survey of about 1,000 German drivers that were conducted by the German automotive research company Puls, 22% of the respondents had a positive attitude towards these cars, 10% were undecided, 44% were skeptical and 24% were hostile towards autonomous cars.[150]

According to a survey of 1,500 consumers across 10 countries that was conducted by Cisco Systems, a full 57 percent “stated they would be likely to ride in a car controlled entirely by technology that does not require a human driver", with Brazil, India and China cited as the countries most willing to trust autonomous technology.[151]

Notable projectsEdit

Major manufacturers[163]
BMW 5 Series Mercedes S 500 Nissan Leaf EV Google Prius and Lexus General Motors Cadillac SRX
Video camera tracks lane markings and reads road signs Stereo camera sees objects ahead in 3-D Front and side radar LIDAR on the roof detects objects around the car in 3-D Several laser sensors
Radar sensors detect objects ahead Additional cameras read road signs and detect traffic lights Camera Camera helps detect objects Radar
Very accurate map Short- and long-range radar Four wide-angle camers show the driver the car's surroundings Very accurate map Very accurate map
Ultrasonic sensors Ultrasonic sensors Inertial measuring unit tracks position
Differential GPS Infrared camera Wheel encoder tracks movement
Side laser scanners Front and side radar

In fictionEdit

In film and televisionEdit

  • KITT, the autonomous Pontiac Trans Am in the 1982 TV series Knight Rider, was sentient and autonomous.
  • The 1983 film Christine features a sentient, autonomous car as the title character.
  • In the 1989 film Batman, starring Michael Keaton, the Batmobile is shown to be able to drive itself to Batman's current location.
  • The 1990 film Total Recall, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, features taxis called Johnny Cabs controlled by artificial intelligence in the car or the android drivers.
  • The 1993 film Demolition Man, starring Sylvester Stallone, set in 2032, features vehicles that can be self-driven or commanded to "Auto Mode" where a voice controlled computer operates the vehicle.
  • The 1994 film Timecop, starring Jean-Claude Van Damme, set in 2004 and 1994, has cars that can either be self-driven or commanded to drive to specific locations such as "home".
  • Another Arnold Schwarzenegger movie, The 6th Day from 2000, features an autonomous car commanded by Michael Rapaport.
  • The 2002 film Minority Report, set in Washington, D.C. in 2054, features an extended chase sequence involving autonomous cars. The vehicle of protagonist John Anderton is transporting him when its systems are overridden by police in an attempt to bring him into custody.
  • The 2004 film I, Robot features autonomous vehicles driving on highways, allowing the car to travel safer at higher speeds than if manually controlled. The option to manually operate the vehicles is available.

In literatureEdit

See alsoEdit




  1. Template:Cite conference
  2. Script error
  3. Script error
  4. Script error
  5. 5.0 5.1 Script error
  6. "The beginning of the end of driving". Motor Trend. January 2013 issue. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
  7. 7.0 7.1 O'Toole (2009) pp. 189-192
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Script error
  9. Script error
  10. 10.0 10.1 Script error
  11. Script error
  12. 12.0 12.1 12.2 Script error
  13. 13.0 13.1 Script error
  14. 14.0 14.1 Script error
  15. Script error
  16. Script error
  17. Script error
  18. Muller, Joann. "With Driverless Cars, Once Again It Is California Leading The Way". Forbes. 26 September 2012. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Script error
  20. 20.0 20.1 Script error
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 Script error
  22. Script error
  23. Script error
  24. 24.0 24.1 Script error
  25. Script error
  26. 26.0 26.1 26.2 Script error
  27. O'Toole (2009) p. 192
  28. 28.0 28.1 Script error
  29. Script error
  30. Script error
  31. Template:Cite book Arth claims that this would be possible if almost all private cars requiring drivers, which are not in use and parked 90% of the time, would be traded for public self-driving taxis that would be in near-constant use.
  32. Script error
  33. Script error
  34. 34.0 34.1 Template:Cite techreport
  35. Tsz-Chiu Au, Michael Quinlan, and Peter Stone. Setpoint Scheduling for Autonomous Vehicle Controllers. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2012. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  36. Script error
  37. Script error
  38. Template:Cite journal
  39. Gurney, Jeffrey K. "Sue My Car Not Me: Products Liability and Accidents Involving Autonomous Vehicles", 2013 U. Ill. J. L. Tech. & Pol'y, Fall 2013.
  40. Script error
  41. Script error
  42. Script error
  43. Script error
  44. Script error
  45. Script error
  46. Script error
  47. Script error
  48. Script error
  49. Script error
  50. Script error
  51. Script error
  52. Script error
  53. Script error
  54. Script error
  55. Script error
  56. Script error
  57. Script error
  58. Script error
  59. Template:Cite book
  60. Robot Car | Raglan Tribe. YouTube. Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  61. No Hands Across America Home Page. Retrieved 4 February 2013.
  62. Script error
  63. Script error
  64. Park shuttle automated driverless vehicle. University of Washington. 2009. Retrieved 14 March 2013.
  65. Script error
  66. Script error
  67. Script error
  68. Script error
  69. "The driverless car is coming. And we all should be glad it is." by Dan Niel Wall Street Journal. 24 September 2012.
  70. "EN-V electric networked car concept by GM begins pilot testing". 14 October 2011. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
  71. Script error
  72. Script error
  73. Script error
  74. "Without driver or map, vans go from Italy to China". Elaine Kurtenbac. Associated Press. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  75. Script error
  76. Script error
  77. Template:Cite book
  78. Script error
  79. Script error
  80. Script error
  81. Script error
  82. Script error
  83. Script error
  84. Script error
  85. Script error
  86. Script error
  87. Script error
  88. Script error
  89. Script error
  90. Script error
  91. Script error
  92. 92.0 92.1 Script error
  93. 93.0 93.1 Script error
  94. Script error
  95. Script error
  96. Script error
  97. Script error
  98. Script error
  99. Script error
  100. Script error
  101. Script error
  102. Script error
  103. Script error
  104. Script error
  105. Script error
  106. Script error
  107. Script error
  108. Script error
  109. Script error
  110. Script error
  111. Script error
  112. Script error
  113. Script error
  114. Script error
  115. Script error
  116. Script error
  117. Script error
  118. Script error
  119. Script error
  120. Script error
  121. Script error
  122. Script error
  123. Script error
  124. Script error
  125. Script error
  126. Script error
  127. Script error
  128. Script error
  129. Script error
  130. Script error
  131. Script error
  132. 132.0 132.1 Script error
  133. Script error
  134. Script error
  135. 135.0 135.1 Script error
  136. Script error
  137. Script error
  138. "Will Computer-Piloted Cars Live Up To Their Potential?". 5 September 2012. Retrieved 7 January 2013.
  139. Script error
  140. 140.0 140.1 Script error
  141. Script error
  142. Script error
  143. Script error
  144. Script error
  145. Script error
  146. Script error
  147. Script error
  148. Script error
  149. 149.0 149.1 Script error
  150. Script error
  151. Script error
  152. 152.0 152.1 Script error
  153. Script error
  154. Script error
  155. Script error
  156. Script error
  157. Script error
  158. Script error
  159. Template:Cite book
  160. Script error
  161. Script error
  162. Script error
  163. Script error

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit

Template:Commons category


Template:Emerging technologies Template:Automobile configuration Template:Mobile robots

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.