FANDOM


Template:Other uses Template:Use mdy dates Template:Refimprove Template:Infobox SG rail

The National Railroad Passenger Corporation, doing business as Amtrak Template:IPAc-en, is a passenger railroad service that provides medium- and long-distance intercity service in the contiguous United States. Founded in 1971 to take over most of the remaining U.S. passenger rail services, it is partially government-funded yet operated and managed as a for-profit corporation.[1]

Amtrak serves more than 500 destinations in 46 states and three Canadian provinces,[2] operating more than 300 trains each day over Template:Convert of track. Some track sections allow trains to run as fast as Template:Convert. In fiscal year 2015, Amtrak served 30.8 million passengers and had $2.185 billion in revenue,[3] while employing more than 20,000 people.[4] Nearly two-thirds of passengers come from the 10 largest metropolitan areas; 83% of passengers travel on routes shorter than 400 miles.[5] Its headquarters is at Union Station in Washington, D.C.[6]

The name "Amtrak" is a portmanteau of the words "America" and "trak", the latter itself a sensational spelling of "track".[7][8]

Template:TOC limit

HistoryEdit

Template:See also

Pre-AmtrakEdit

Privately operated passenger rail serviceEdit

File:Illinois Central Railroad Panama Limited diesel streamliner.JPG
File:Boston and Maine Railroad -1.jpg
File:The Rebel streamlined train.JPG

From the mid-19th century until about 1920, nearly all intercity travelers in the United States moved by rail.[9]Template:Page needed Historically, U.S. passenger trains were owned and operated by the same privately owned companies that operated freight trains. About 65,000 railroad passenger cars operated in 1929.[10]

From 1920 into the later 20th century, passenger rail's popularity diminished and there was a series of pullbacks and tentative recoveries. Rail passenger revenues declined dramatically between 1920 and 1934 because of the rise of the automobile.[9]Template:Page needed In the same period, many travelers were lost to interstate bus companies such as Greyhound Lines. However, in the mid-1930s, railroads reignited popular imagination with service improvements and new, diesel-powered streamliners, such as the gleaming silver Pioneer Zephyr and Flying Yankee.[9]Template:Page needed Even with the improvements, on a relative basis, traffic continued to decline, and by 1940 railroads held just 67 percent of passenger-miles in the United States.[9]Template:Page needed

World War II broke the malaise; passenger traffic soared sixfold thanks to troop movements and restrictions on automobile fuel.[9]Template:Page needed After the war, railroads rejuvenated overworked and neglected fleets with fast and often luxurious streamliners – epitomized by the Super Chief and California Zephyr – which inspired the last major resurgence in passenger rail travel.Template:Citation needed

The postwar resurgence was short-lived. In 1946, there remained 45 percent fewer passenger trains than in 1929,[9]Template:Page needed and the decline quickened despite railroad optimism. Passengers disappeared and so did trains. Few trains generated profits; most produced losses. Broad-based passenger rail deficits appeared as early as 1948[9]Template:Page needed and by the mid-1950s railroads claimed aggregate annual losses on passenger services of more than $700 million (almost $5 billion in 2005 dollars when adjusted for inflation).[10][11][12]Template:Page needed

By 1965, only 10,000 rail passenger cars were in operation, 85 percent fewer than in 1929.[10] Passenger service was provided on only Template:Convert of track, a stark decline.[10] The 1960s also saw the end of railway post office revenues, which had helped some of the remaining trains break even.[13]

Causes of the decline of privately operated passenger rail serviceEdit

The causes of the decline of passenger rail in the United States were complex. Until 1920, rail was the only practical form of intercity transport, but the industry was subject to government regulation and labor inflexibility.[14][15] By 1930, the railroad companies had constructed, with private funding, a vast and relatively efficient transportation network.Template:Citation needed

When the federal government began to construct the National Highway System, the railroads found themselves faced with unprecedented competition for passengers and freight with automobiles, buses, trucks, and aircraft, all of which were heavily subsidized by the government road and airport building programs. In 1916, the amount of track in the United States peaked at Template:Convert, compared to Template:Convert in 2007 (although it remained the largest rail network of any country in the world).[16][17]

Some routes had been built primarily to facilitate the sale of stock in the railroad companies; they were redundant from the beginningTemplate:Citation needed. These were the first to be abandoned as the railroads' financial positions deteriorated, and the rails were routinely removed to save money on taxes. Many rights-of-way were destroyed by being broken up and built over, but others remained the property of the railroad or were taken over by local or state authorities and turned into rail trails.Template:Citation needed

Government regulationEdit

From about 1910 to 1921, the federal government introduced a populist rate-setting scheme. During World War I, the railroads proved incapable of functioning as a cohesive network. This forced the United States Government to nationalize the rail industry temporarily. In the 1920s, railroad profits stagnated, many redundant and unprofitable lines were abandoned, and many passenger facilities were allowed to fall into a cycle of deferred maintenance, all of which in small ways drove passengers away, either by higher fares or less appealing service.[15] At the same time, the rise in popularity of the automobile and U.S. highways such as the Lincoln Highway began to eat away at local rail passenger traffic. Increases in labor costs also further hindered the railroads' ability to make profits on smaller and more sparsely populated lines.[15]

The primary regulatory authority affecting railroads, beginning in the late 19th century, was the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). The ICC played a leading role in rate-setting which at times hindered railroads' ability to be profitable in the passenger market. In the 1930s, train speeds were ever increasing, but no advancements were being made in signaling and safety systems to prevent collisions. This led to the horrific Naperville train disaster of 1946 and other crashes in New York in 1950. In 1947,[18][19] the ICC issued an order requiring U.S. railroads, by the end of 1951, to install automatic train stop, automatic train control or cab signaling wherever any trains would travel at Template:Convert or faster.[20]

Such technology was not widely implemented outside the Northeast,[21] effectively placing a speed limit in other areas which is still in effect today, and why the Template:Convert maximum passenger train speed is common in the United States. In 1958, the ICC was granted authority to allow or reject modifications and eliminations of passenger routes (train-offs).[22] Many routes required beneficial pruning, but the ICC delayed action by an average of eight months and when it did authorize modifications, the ICC insisted that unsuccessful routes be merged with profitable ones. Thus, fast, popular rail service was transformed into slow, unpopular service.[14]

The ICC was even more critical of corporate mergers. Many combinations which railroads sought to complete were delayed for years and even decades, such as the merger of the New York Central Railroad and Pennsylvania Railroad, into what eventually became Penn Central, and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad and Erie Railroad into the Erie Lackawanna Railway. By the time the ICC approved the mergers in the 1960s, slower trains, years of deteriorating equipment and station facilities, and the flight of passengers to air and automobile transportation had taken their toll and the mergers were unsuccessful at preserving these railroad's passenger train service.Template:Citation needed It is important to note the Erie Lackawanna was never a major hauler of passengers, nor its predecessor roads, and was mostly a freight railroad. The Penn Central merger was a failure because it merged two large struggling railroads on paper only, two separate management structures remained with little or no integration of assets or management of the former Pennsylvania Railroad and New York Central system. The massive overhead costs of this operating scheme played a far greater role in the Penn Central failure than any actions taken by the ICC or any other US Government agency.Template:Citation needed

TaxationEdit

At the same time, railroads carried a substantial tax burden. A World War II–era excise tax of 15% on passenger rail travel survived until 1962.[23] Local governments, far from providing needed support to passenger rail, viewed rail infrastructure as a ready source for property tax revenues. In one extreme example, in 1959, the Great Northern Railway, which owned 0.34% of the land in Lincoln County, Montana, was assessed more than 91% of all school taxes in the county.[14] To this day, railroads are generally taxed at a higher rate than other industries, and the rates vary greatly from state to state.[24]

Labor-related issuesEdit

Template:Stack Railroads also faced antiquated work rules and inflexible relationships with trade unions. Work rules did not adapt to technological change.[14] Average train speeds had doubled from 1919 to 1959, but unions resisted efforts to modify their existing 100- to 150-mile work days. As a result, railroad workers' average work days were roughly cut in half, from 5–7½ hours in 1919 to 2½–3¾ hours in 1959.Template:Citation needed Between 1947 and 1957, passenger railroad financial efficiency dropped by 42% per mile.Template:Citation needed

Subsidized competitionEdit

While passenger rail faced internal and governmental pressures, new challenges appeared that undermined the dominance of passenger rail: highways and commercial aviation. The passenger rail industry declined as governments put money into the construction of highways and government-owned airports and the air traffic control system.Template:Citation needed

As automobiles became more attainable to most Americans, the freedom, increased convenience and individualization of automobile travel became the norm. Government actively began to respond with funds from its treasury and later with fuel-tax funds to build a non-profit network of roads not subject to property taxation. Highways then surpassed the for-profit rail network that the railroads had built in previous generations with corporate capital and government land grants. All told between 1921 and 1955 governmental entities, using taxpayer money and in response to taxpayer demand, financed more than $93 billion worth of pavement, construction, and maintenance.[14]

In the 1950s, affordable commercial aviation expanded as the Jet Age arrived. Governmental entities built urban and suburban airports, funded construction of highways to provide access to the airports, and provided air traffic control services.Template:Citation needed

Loss of U.S. Mail contractsEdit

Until 1966, most U.S. Postal Service mail was transported on passenger trains. The mail contracts kept many passenger trains economically viable. In 1966, the U.S. Postal Service switched to trucks and airplanes, subsidizing planes instead of trains, which no longer had mail as a source of revenue.Template:Citation needed

FormationEdit

Template:See also Template:Stack In the late 1960s, the end of passenger rail in the United States seemed near. First had come the requests for termination of services; then came the bankruptcy filings. The Pullman Company became insolvent in 1969,[25]Template:Rp followed, in 1970, by the dominant railroad in the Northeastern United States, the Penn Central.[26]Template:Rp It now seemed that passenger rail's financial problems might bring down the railroad industry as a whole, yet few in government wanted to be held responsible for the extinction of the passenger train.Template:Citation needed

In 1970, Congress passed, and President Richard Nixon signed into law, the Rail Passenger Service Act. Proponents of the bill, led by the National Association of Railroad Passengers (NARP), sought government funding to assure the continuation of passenger trains. They conceived the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (NRPC), a hybrid public-private entity that would receive taxpayer funding and assume operation of intercity passenger trains. The original working brand name for NRPC was Railpax, but shortly before the company started operating it was changed to Amtrak. There were several key provisions:Template:Citation needed

  • Any railroad operating intercity passenger service could contract with the NRPC, thereby joining the national system.
  • Participating railroads bought into the NRPC using a formula based on their recent intercity passenger losses. The purchase price could be satisfied either by cash or rolling stock; in exchange, the railroads received NRPC common stock.
  • Any participating railroad was freed of the obligation to operate intercity passenger service after May 1, 1971, except for those services chosen by the Department of Transportation (DOT) as part of a "basic system" of service and paid for by NRPC using its federal funds.
  • Railroads that chose not to join the NRPC system were required to continue operating their existing passenger service until 1975 and thenceforth had to pursue the customary ICC approval process for any discontinuance or alteration to the service.

Of the 26 railroads still offering intercity passenger service in 1970, only six declined to join Amtrak.[27] Nearly everyone involved expected the experiment to be short-lived. The Nixon administration and many Washington insiders viewed the NRPC as a politically expedient way for the President and Congress to give passenger trains a "last hurrah" as demanded by the public. They expected Amtrak to quietly disappear as public interest waned.[28] After Fortune magazine exposed the manufactured mismanagement in 1974, Louis W. Menk, chairman of the Burlington Northern Railroad, remarked that the story was undermining the scheme to dismantle Amtrak.[29] Proponents also hoped that government intervention would be brief, but their view was that Amtrak would soon support itself. Neither view has proved correct. Popular support has allowed Amtrak to continue in operation longer than critics imagined, while financial results have made a return to private operation infeasible.Template:Citation needed

1970s: the Rainbow EraEdit

Amtrak began operations on May 1, 1971.[26] Amtrak received no rail tracks or right-of-way at its inception. All Amtrak's routes were continuations of prior service, although Amtrak pruned about half the passenger rail network. Of the 364 trains operated previously, Amtrak only continued 182. On trains that continued, to the extent possible, schedules were retained with only minor changes from the Official Guide of the Railways, and under the same names.Template:Citation needed Several major corridors became freight-only, including the ex-New York Central Railroad's Water Level Route across New York and Ohio and Grand Trunk Western Railroad's Chicago to Detroit route. Reduced passenger train schedules created headaches. A 19-hour layover became necessary for eastbound travel on the James Whitcomb Riley between Chicago and Newport News.Template:Citation needed

Amtrak inherited problems with train stations, most notably deferred maintenance, and redundant facilities resulting from competing companies that served the same areas. On the day it started, Amtrak was given the responsibility of rerouting passenger trains from the seven train terminals in Chicago (LaSalle, Dearborn, Grand Central, Randolph, Chicago Northwestern Terminal, Central, and Union) into just one, Union Station. In New York City, Amtrak had to pay to maintain both Penn Station and Grand Central Terminal because of the lack of track connections to bring trains from upstate New York into Penn Station, a problem not rectified until the building of the Empire Connection in 1991.Template:Citation needed Amtrak would abandon numerous large stations whose upkeep could no longer be justified. On the other hand, the creation of the Los Angeles–Seattle Coast Starlight from three formerly separate trains was an immediate success.Template:Citation needed

Amtrak's early years are often called the Rainbow Era, which refers to the ad hoc arrangement of the rolling stock and locomotives from a pool of equipment, acquired by Amtrak, at its formation, that consisted of a large mix of paint schemes from their former owners. This rolling stock, which for the most part still bore the pre-Amtrak colors and logos, formed the multi-colored consists of early Amtrak trains. By mid-1971, Amtrak began purchasing some of the equipment it had leased, including 286 second-hand locomotives (of the EMD E and F types, 30 GG1 electric locomotives) and 1,290 passenger cars, and continued leasing even more motive power. By 1975, the official Amtrak color scheme was painted on most Amtrak equipment and newly purchased locomotives and rolling stock began appearing.[30]

Amtrak soon had the opportunity to acquire rights-of-way. Following the bankruptcy of several northeastern railroads in the early 1970s, including Penn Central, which owned and operated the Northeast Corridor (NEC), Congress passed the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976.[31] A large part of the legislation was directed to the creation of Conrail, but the law also enabled the transfer of the portions of the NEC not already owned by state authorities to Amtrak. Amtrak acquired the majority of the NEC on April 1, 1976.[32] (The portion in Massachusetts is owned by the Commonwealth and managed by Amtrak. The route from New Haven to New Rochelle is owned by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the Connecticut Department of Transportation as the New Haven Line.)Template:Citation needed This main line became Amtrak's "jewel" asset, and helped the railroad generate revenue. While the NEC ridership and revenues were higher than any other segment of the system, the cost of operating and maintaining the corridor proved to be overwhelming. As a result, Amtrak's federal subsidy was increased dramatically. In subsequent years, other short route segments not needed for freight operations were transferred to Amtrak.Template:Citation needed

In its first decade, Amtrak fell far short of financial independence, which continues today, but it did find modest success rebuilding trade. Outside factors discouraged competing transport, such as fuel shortages which increased costs of automobile and airline travel, and strikes which disrupted airline operations. Investments in Amtrak's track, equipment and information also made Amtrak more relevant to America's transportation needs.[33][34] Amtrak's ridership increased from 16.6 million in 1972 to 21 million in 1981.[35]

1980s and 1990sEdit

Template:Expand section

File:AMTK 315 Tun17 CZ Nwcstle Mar1995RP - Flickr - drewj1946.jpg
File:Acela old saybrook ct summer2011.jpg
File:Amtrak California Zephyr Engines 1 and 56 Eastbound at Grand Junction - img1.jpg
File:Amtrak - GE P42DC - Heritage Phase III Livery.JPG

In 1982 former Secretary of the Navy and retired Southern Railway head William Graham Claytor Jr. became president. Claytor came out of retirement to lead Amtrak after the disastrous financial results during the Carter administration (1977–1981).[36]Template:Page needed Despite frequent clashes with the Reagan administration over funding, Claytor enjoyed a good relationship with John H. Riley, the head of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and with members of Congress. Limited funding led Claytor to use short-term debt to fund operations.[37]

Ridership stagnated at roughly 20 million passengers per year amid uncertain government aid from 1981 to about 2000.[35][38] Thomas Downs succeeded Claytor in 1993. Amtrak's stated goal remained "operational self-sufficiency." By this time, however, Amtrak had a large overhang of debt from years of underfunding, and in the mid-1990s, Amtrak suffered through a serious cash crunch. Under Downs Congress included a provision in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 that resulted in Amtrak receiving a $2.3 billion tax refund that resolved their cash crisis.[39] However, Congress also instituted a "glide-path" to financial self-sufficiency, excluding railroad retirement tax act payments.[40]

George Warrington became president in 1998 with a mandate to make Amtrak financially self-sufficient. Passengers became "guests" and there were expansions into express freight work, but the financial plans failed. Amtrak's inroads in express freight delivery created additional friction with competing freight operators, including the trucking industry. Delivery was delayed of much anticipated high-speed trainsets for the improved Acela Express service, which promised to be a strong source of income and favorable publicity along the Northeast Corridor between Boston and Washington, D.C.Template:Citation needed

21st centuryEdit

Ridership increased during the first decade of the 21st century after implementation of capital improvements in the NEC and rises in automobile fuel costs. The inauguration of the high-speed Acela Express in late 2000 generated considerable publicity and led to major ridership gains. However, through the late 1990s and very early 21st century, Amtrak could not add sufficient express freight revenue or cut sufficient other expenditures to break even. By 2002, it was clear that Amtrak could not achieve self-sufficiency, but Congress continued to authorize funding and released Amtrak from the requirement.[41] In early 2002 David L. Gunn replaced Warrington as president. In a departure from his predecessors' promises to make Amtrak self-sufficient in the short term, Gunn argued that no form of passenger transportation in the United States is self-sufficient as the economy is currently structured.[42] Highways, airports, and air traffic control all require large government expenditures to build and operate, coming from the Highway Trust Fund and Aviation Trust Fund paid for by user fees, highway fuel and road taxes, and, in the case of the General Fund, from general taxation.[43] Gunn dropped most freight express business and worked to eliminate deferred maintenance.[44]

A plan by the Bush administration "to privatize parts of the national passenger rail system and spin off other parts to partial state ownership" provoked disagreement within Amtrak's board of directors. Late in 2005 Gunn was fired.[45] Gunn's replacement, Alexander Kummant (2006–2008), was committed to operating a national rail network, and, like Gunn, opposed the notion of putting the Northeast Corridor under separate ownership,[46] He said that shedding the system's long-distance routes would amount to selling national assets that are on par with national parks, and that Amtrak's abandonment of these routes would be irreversible. In late 2006, Amtrak unsuccessfully sought annual congressional funding of $1 billion for ten years.[46] In early 2007, Amtrak employed 20,000 people in 46 states and served 25 million passengers a year, its highest amount since its founding in 1970. Politico noted a key problem: "the rail system chronically operates in the red. A pattern has emerged: Congress overrides cutbacks demanded by the White House and appropriates enough funds to keep Amtrak from plunging into insolvency. But, Amtrak advocates say, that is not enough to fix the system's woes." [47]

Joseph H. Boardman replaced Kummant as President and CEO in late 2008.[48] In 2011, Amtrak announced its intention to build a small segment of a high-speed rail corridor from Penn Station in NYC, under the Hudson River in new tunnels, and double-tracking the line to Newark, NJ called the Gateway Project, estimated to cost $13.5 billion.[49][50][51] After years of almost revolving-door CEOs at Amtrak, in December 2013, Boardman was named "Railroader of the Year" by Railway Age magazine, which noted that with over five years in the job, he is the second-longest serving head of Amtrak since it was formed more than 40 years ago.[52]

From May 2011 to May 2012, Amtrak celebrated its 40th anniversary with festivities across the country that started on National Train Day (May 7, 2011). A commemorative book entitled Amtrak: An American Story was published, and a documentary was created. Four commemorative locomotives and a 40th Anniversary Exhibit Train toured the country. The Exhibit Train visited 45 communities and welcomed more than 85,000 visitors.[53] It was an entirely rebuilt train powered by GE Genesis locomotives and included three refurbished ex-Santa Fe baggage cars and a food service car. Four Genesis locomotives were painted into retired Amtrak paint schemes: No. 156 was in Phase 1 colors, No. 66 was in Phase 2 colors, No. 145 and No. 822 were in Phase 3 colors (822 pulled the Exhibit train),[54] and No. 184 was in Phase 4 colors.[55][56] In 2014 Amtrak began offering a "residency" program for writers.[57]

OperationsEdit

RoutesEdit

Main article: List of Amtrak routes

Amtrak is no longer required by law to operate a national route system, but it is encouraged to do so.[58] Amtrak has presence in 46 of the 48 contiguous states (except Wyoming and South Dakota). Amtrak services fall into three groups: short-haul service on the Northeast Corridor, short-haul corridor service outside the Northeast Corridor, and long-distance service.Template:Citation needed

Service on the Northeast Corridor, between Boston, and Washington, D.C., as well as between Philadelphia and Harrisburg, is powered by overhead electric wires; for the rest of the system, diesel locomotives are used. Routes vary widely in frequency of service, from three-days-a-week trains on the Sunset Limited to weekday service several times per hour on the Northeast Corridor (NEC).[59] Amtrak also operates a captive bus service, Thruway Motorcoach, which provides connections to train routes.Template:Citation needed

The most popular and heavily used services are those running on the NEC, including the Acela Express and Northeast Regional. The NEC runs from Boston to Washington, D.C. via New York City and Philadelphia. Some services continue into Virginia. The NEC services accounted for 11.4 million of Amtrak's 31.6 million passengers in fiscal year 2013.[60] Outside the NEC the most popular services are the short-haul corridors in California. These include the Pacific Surfliner, Capitol Corridor, and San Joaquin, supplemented by an extensive network of connecting buses. Together the California corridor trains accounted for a combined 5,627,000 passengers in fiscal year 2013.[60] Other popular corridors include New York State's Empire Service, NYC-Albany-Syracuse-Rochester-Buffalo-Niagara Falls-Toronto, with 1,488,000 passengers last year,Template:When and Pennsylvania's Keystone Service NYC-Philadelphia-Lancaster-Harrisburg with 1,467,000 passengers.Template:Citation needed

Four of the six stations busiest by boardings are on the NEC: New York (Penn Station) (first), Washington (Union Station) (second), Philadelphia (30th Street Station) (third), and Boston (South Station) (sixth). The other two are Chicago (Union Station) (fourth) and Los Angeles (Union Station) (fifth).[61]

EfficiencyEdit

Per passenger mile, Amtrak is 30–40 percent more energy-efficient than commercial airlines and automobiles overall,[62] though the exact figures for particular routes depend on load factor along with other variables. The electrified trains in the NEC are considerably more efficient than Amtrak's diesels and can feed energy captured from regenerative braking back to the electrical grid. Passenger rail is also very competitive with other modes in terms of safety per mile.

Mode Revenue per passenger mile[63] Energy consumption per passenger mile[62] Deaths per 100 million passenger miles[64] Reliability[65]
Domestic airlines 13.0¢ 2,931 BTUs less than 0.01 deaths 81.9%
Transit buses 12.9¢[66] 2,656 BTUs 0.06 deaths N/A
Amtrak 30.7¢ 1,745 BTUs 0.03 deaths 83%
Autos N/A 3,501 BTUs 0.48 deaths N/A

On-time performance is calculated differently for airlines than for Amtrak. A plane is considered on-time if it arrives within 15 minutes of the schedule. Amtrak uses a sliding scale, with trips under Template:Convert considered late if they are more than 10 minutes behind schedule, up to 30 minutes for trips over Template:Convert in length.[65]

In 2005, Amtrak's carbon dioxide equivalent emissions per passenger kilometre were 0.116 kg.[67] For comparison, this is similar to a car with two people,[68] about twice as high as the UK rail average (where much more of the system is electrified),[69] about four times the average US motorcoach,[70] and about eight times a Finnish electric intercity train or fully loaded fifty-seat coach.[71] It is, however, about two thirds of the raw CO2-equivalent emissions of a long-distance domestic flight.[72] Amtrak is constantly working to improve its carbon emissions. New electric locomotives, the ACS-64s, coming into service on the Northeast Corridor will be much more efficient, lighter weight, and include regenerative braking. Other new cars on order will also be much more energy efficient.Template:Citation needed

Intermodal connectionsEdit

Intermodal connections between Amtrak trains and other transportation are available at many stations. Most Amtrak rail stations in downtown areas have connections to local public transport. Amtrak also code shares with United Airlines, providing service between Newark Liberty International Airport (via its Amtrak station and AirTrain Newark) and Philadelphia 30th St, Wilmington, Stamford, and New Haven. Special codes are used to designate these intermodal routes, such as "ZVE" to designate the combination of New Haven's Union Station and Newark International Airport and the Amtrak connection between them. Amtrak also serves airport stations at Milwaukee, Oakland, Burbank, and Baltimore.Template:Citation needed

Amtrak coordinates Thruway Motorcoach service to extend many of its routes, especially in California.Template:Citation needed

On-time performanceEdit

Outside the Northeast Corridor and stretches of track in Southern California and Michigan, most Amtrak trains run on tracks owned and operated by privately owned freight railroads. Freight rail operators are required under federal law to give dispatching preference to Amtrak trains. Some freight railroads have been accused of violating or skirting these regulations, allegedly resulting in passenger trains waiting in sidings for an hour or longer while waiting for freight traffic to clear the track. The railroads' dispatching practices were investigated in 2008,[73] resulting in stricter laws about train priority. Subsequently Amtrak's overall on-time performance went up from 74.7% in fiscal 2008 to 84.7% in 2009, with long-distance trains and others outside the NEC seeing the greatest benefit. The Missouri River Runner jumped from 11% to 95%, becoming one of Amtrak's best performers. The Texas Eagle went from 22.4% to 96.7%, and the California Zephyr, with a 5% on-time record in 2008, went up to 78.3%.[74] This improved performance coincided with a general economic downturn, resulting in the lowest freight rail traffic volumes since at least 1988, meaning less freight traffic to impede passenger traffic.[75]

RidershipEdit

File:Annual Amtrak Ridership Graph thru FY2012.svg

Amtrak carried 15,848,327 passengers in 1972, its first full year of operation.[76] Ridership peaked at 31,240,565 in 2012, double the total in 1972.[77] Total ridership in 2014 was 30,921,274.[78]

Guest RewardsEdit

Amtrak's loyalty program, Guest Rewards,[79] is similar to the frequent-flyer programs of many airlines. Guest Rewards members accumulate points by riding Amtrak and through other activities, and can redeem these points for free or discounted Amtrak tickets and other rewards.[79]

Commuter servicesEdit

Main article: Commuter rail in North America

Through various commuter services, Amtrak serves an additional 61.1 million passengers per year in conjunction with state and regional authorities in California (through Amtrak California and Metrolink), Connecticut (through Shore Line East), and Maryland (through MARC).Template:Citation needed

LinesEdit

Template:Stack Along the NEC and in several other areas, Amtrak owns Template:Convert including 17 tunnels consisting of Template:Convert of track, and 1,186 bridges (including the famous Hell Gate Bridge) consisting of Template:Convert of track. In several places, primarily in New England, Amtrak leases tracks, providing track maintenance and controlling train movements. Most often, these tracks are leased from state, regional, or local governments. Amtrak owns and operates the following lines:[80]

In addition to these lines Amtrak owns station and yard tracks in Chicago, Los Angeles, New Orleans, New York City, Oakland (Kirkham Street Yard), Orlando, Portland, Oregon, Saint Paul, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. Amtrak leases station and yard tracks in Hialeah, near Miami, Florida, from the State of Florida.Template:Citation needed

Amtrak owns the Chicago Union Station Company (Chicago Union Station) and New York Penn Station. It has a 99.7% interest in the Washington Terminal Company[85] (tracks around Washington Union Station) and 99% of 30th Street Limited (Philadelphia 30th Street Station). Also owned by Amtrak is Passenger Railroad Insurance.[86]

Rolling stockEdit

Main article: List of Amtrak rolling stock

Amtrak owns 2,142 railway cars and 425 locomotives for revenue runs and service. Examples include the GE P42DC, the Siemens ACS-64, the Amfleet car and the Superliner car. Occasionally private cars, or loaned locomotives from other railroads can be found on Amtrak trains.

On-board servicesEdit

Classes of serviceEdit

Template:Refimprove section Template:Stack Template:As of Amtrak offers four classes of service: First Class, Sleeper Service, Business Class, and Coach Class:

  • First Class: First Class service is currently offered on the Acela Express only. Previously First Class was offered on the Northeast Direct (predecessor to the Northeast Regional) as well as the Metroliner up until that service's discontinuation in 2006. Seats are larger than those of Business Class and come in a variety of seating modes (single, single with table, double, double with table and wheelchair accessible). First Class is located in separate cars from the other classes. First Class includes complimentary meal and beverage service along with free newspapers and hot towel service. First Class passengers have access to Amtrak ClubAcela lounges in Washington D.C., Philadelphia, New York, and Boston.
  • Sleeper Service: Sleeper Service comprises room accommodations on long-distance trains. Rooms are classified into roomettes, bedrooms, family bedrooms and accessible bedrooms. Included in the price of a room are full meals and attendant service. At night, attendants convert rooms into sleeping areas with fold-down beds and fresh linens. Complimentary juice, coffee and bottled water are included as well. Sleeper car passengers have access to all passenger facilities aboard the train. Sleeper passengers have access to the ClubAcela lounges along the Northeast Corridor, Metropolitan Lounges in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland (Oregon), and unattended First Class Lounges in New Orleans, Raleigh, St. Louis, and St. Paul/Minneapolis.
  • Business Class: Business Class is offered on the Acela Express, Northeast Regional, many short-haul corridor trains and some long-distance trains. Business Class passengers receive complimentary non-alcoholic beverages and newspapers.
  • Coach Class: Coach Class is the standard class of service on all Amtrak trains except the Acela Express. Seats in coach recline and feature fold-down trays, lighting, and 120v power outlets. Coaches on long-distance trains are configured with fewer seats per car so that passengers have additional legroom. Most Amtrak trains are all-reserved; a limited number of short-haul corridor trains offer unreserved coach. There is no difference in equipment between reserved and unreserved.[87]

WiFi and electronic servicesEdit

Amtrak launched an e-ticketing system on the Downeaster in November 2011,[88] and rolled it out nationwide on July 30, 2012. Amtrak officials said the system gives "more accurate knowledge in realtime of who is on the train which greatly improves the safety and security of passengers; en route reporting of onboard equipment problems to mechanical crews which may result in faster resolution of the issue; and more efficient financial reporting."[89]

Food and beverage service and warehouse inventories are now managed in real time by electronic systems. The anticipated savings led CEO Boardman to predict that food service could break even within a few years.Template:Citation needed

Amtrak first offered free Wi-Fi service to passengers aboard the Downeaster in 2008, the Acela Express and the "Regionals" on the NEC in 2010, and the Amtrak Cascades in 2011. In February 2014, Amtrak rolled out Wi-Fi on corridor trains out of Chicago. When all the Midwest cars offer the AmtrakConnect service, about 85% of all Amtrak passengers nationwide will have Wi-Fi access.[90][91] Template:As of, most Amtrak passengers have access to free Wi-Fi. The service has developed a reputation for being unreliable and slow.[92][93]

BaggageEdit

File:Amtrak Baggage Car (6138458661).jpg

Amtrak allows carry-on baggage on all routes; services with baggage cars allow checked baggage at select stations.Template:Citation needed With the passage of the Wicker Amendment in 2010 passengers are allowed to put lawfully-owned, unloaded firearms in checked Amtrak baggage, reversing a decade-long ban on such carriage.[94] Amtrak Express Template:Reporting mark provides small-package and less-than-truckload shipping among more than 100 cities. Amtrak Express also offers station-to-station shipment of human remains to many express cities. At smaller stations, funeral directors must load and unload the shipment onto and off the train. Amtrak hauled mail for the United States Postal Service and time-sensitive freight, but canceled these services in October 2004 due to minuscule profits.[95] On most parts of the few lines that Amtrak owns, trackage-rights agreements allow freight railroads to use its trackage.

Company officersEdit

File:W. Graham Claytor 1984.jpg

List of presidentsEdit

[48][107]

Board of directorsEdit

Labor issuesEdit

In the modern era, Amtrak faces a number of important labor issues. In the area of pension funding, because of limitations originally imposed by Congress, most Amtrak workers were traditionally classified as "railroad employees" and contributions to the Railroad Retirement system have been made for those employees. However, because the size of the contributions is determined on an industry-wide basis rather than with reference to the employer for whom the employees work, some critics, such as the National Association of Railroad Passengers, maintain that Amtrak is subsidizing freight railroad pensions by as much as US$150 million/year.[115]

In recent times, efforts at reforming passenger rail have addressed labor issues. In 1997 Congress released Amtrak from a prohibition on contracting for labor outside the corporation (and outside its unions), opening the door to privatization.[116] Since that time, many of Amtrak's employees have been working without a contract. The most recent contract, signed in 1999, was mainly retroactive.

Because of the fragmentation of railroad unions by job, Template:As of Amtrak has 14 separate unions to negotiate with. Plus, it has 24 separate contracts with those unions.[117] This makes it difficult to make substantial changes, in contrast to a situation where one union negotiates with one employer. Former Amtrak president Kummant followed a cooperative posture with Amtrak's trade unions, ruling out plans to privatize large parts of Amtrak's unionized workforce.[118]

In late 2007 and early 2008, however, major labor issues arose, a result of a dispute between Amtrak and 16 unions regarding which employees should receive healthcare benefits.Template:Citation needed The dispute was not resolved quickly, and the situation escalated to the point of President Bush declaring a Presidential Emergency Board to resolve the issues. It was not immediately successful, and a strike was threatened to begin on January 30, 2008. In the middle of that month, however, it was announced that Amtrak and the unions had come to terms and January 30 passed without a strike. In late February it was announced that three more unions had worked out their differences, and as of that time it seemed unlikely that any more issues would arise in the near future.Template:Citation needed

Public fundingEdit

Amtrak receives annual appropriations from federal and state governments to supplement operating and capital programs.

Total federal grant appropriations per year (billions)
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013[119] FY 2014 FY 2015[120]
$1.488 $1.565 $1.484 $1.418 $1.374 $1.37 $1.375

History of fundingEdit

1970s to 1990sEdit

Amtrak commenced operations in 1971 with $40 million in direct federal aid, $100 million in federally insured loans, and a somewhat larger private contribution.[121] Officials expected that Amtrak would break even by 1974, but those expectations proved unrealistic and annual direct Federal aid reached a 17-year high in 1981 of $1.25 billion.[122] During the Reagan administration, appropriations were halved and by 1986, federal support fell to a decade low of $601 million, almost none of which were capital appropriations.[123] In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Congress continued the reductionist trend even while Amtrak expenses held steady or rose. Amtrak was forced to borrow to meet short-term operating needs, and by 1995 Amtrak was on the brink of a cash crisis and was unable to continue to service its debts.[124] In response, in 1997 Congress authorized $5.2 billion for Amtrak over the next five years – largely to complete the Acela capital project – on the condition that Amtrak submit to the ultimatum of self-sufficiency by 2003 or liquidation.[125] While Amtrak made financial improvements during this period,Template:Citation needed it did not achieve self-sufficiency.[126]

2000sEdit

In 2004, a stalemate in federal support of Amtrak forced cutbacks in services and routes as well as resumption of deferred maintenance. In fiscal 2004 and 2005, Congress appropriated about $1.2 billion for Amtrak, $300 million more than President George W. Bush had requested. However, the company's board requested $1.8 billion through fiscal 2006, the majority of which (about $1.3 billion) would be used to bring infrastructure, rolling stock, and motive power back to a state of good repair. In Congressional testimony, the DOT Inspector General confirmed that Amtrak would need at least $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion in fiscal 2006 and $2 billion in fiscal 2007 just to maintain the status quo. In 2006, Amtrak received just under $1.4 billion, with the condition that Amtrak would reduce (but not eliminate) food and sleeper service losses. Thus, dining service was simplified and now requires two fewer on-board service workers. Only Auto Train and Empire Builder services continue regular made-on-board meal service. In 2010 the Senate approved a bill to provide $1.96 billion to Amtrak, but cut the approval for high-speed rail to a $1 billion appropriation.[126]

File:Amtrak Cascades cars.jpg
File:NCF59.jpg

State governments have partially filled the breach left by reductions in federal aid. Several states have entered into operating partnerships with Amtrak, notably California, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Oregon, Missouri, Washington, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, Wisconsin, Vermont, Maine, and New York, as well as the Canadian province of British Columbia, which provides some of the resources for the operation of the Cascades route.

With the dramatic rise in gasoline prices during 2007–2008, Amtrak has seen record ridership.[127] Capping a steady five-year increase in ridership overall, regional lines saw 12% year-over-year growth in May 2008.[128] In October 2007, the Senate passed S-294, Passenger Rail Improvement and Investment Act of 2007 (70–22) sponsored by Senators Frank Lautenberg and Trent Lott. Despite a veto threat by President Bush, a similar bill passed the House on June 11, 2008, with a veto-proof margin (311–104).[129] The final bill, spurred on by the September 12 Metrolink collision in California and retitled Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, was signed into law by President Bush on October 16, 2008. The bill appropriates $2.6 billion a year in Amtrak funding through 2013.[130]

2010sEdit

Amtrak points out that in 2010, its farebox recovery (percentage of operating costs covered by revenues generated by passenger fares) was 79%, the highest reported for any U.S. passenger railroad.[60]

Amtrak has argued that it needs to increase capital program costs in 2013 in order to replace old train equipment because the multi-year maintenance costs for those trains exceeds what it would cost to simply buy new equipment that would not need to be repaired for several years. However, despite an initial request for more than $2.1 billion in funding for the year, the company had to deal with a year-over-year cut in 2013 federal appropriations, dropping to under $1.4 billion for the first time in several years.[119] Amtrak stated in 2010 that the backlog of needed repairs of the track it owns on the Northeast Corridor included over 200 bridges, most dating to the 19th century, tunnels under Baltimore dating to the American Civil War Era and functionally obsolete track switches which would cost $5.2 billion to repair (more than triple Amtrak's total annual budget).[131] Amtrak's budget is only allocated on a yearly basis, and it has been argued by Joseph Vranich that this makes multi-year development programs and long-term fiscal planning difficult if not impossible.[132]Template:Page needed

In Fiscal Year 2011, the U.S. Congress granted Amtrak $563 million for operating and $922 million for capital programs.[133]

ControversyEdit

Government aid to Amtrak was controversial from the beginning. The formation of Amtrak in 1971 was criticized as a bailout serving corporate rail interests and union railroaders, not the traveling public. Critics have asserted that Amtrak has proven incapable of operating as a business and that it does not provide valuable transportation services meriting public support,[132]Template:Page needed a "mobile money-burning machine."[134] Many argued that subsidies should be ended, national rail service terminated, and the NEC turned over to private interests. "To fund a Nostalgia Limited is not in the public interest."[135] Critics also question Amtrak's energy efficiency,[136] though the U.S. Department of Energy considers Amtrak among the most energy-efficient forms of transportation.[137]

ProponentsTemplate:Who have pointed out that the government heavily subsidizes the Interstate Highway System, the Federal Aviation Administration, many airports, among many aspects of passenger aviation. Massive government aid to those forms of travel was a primary factor in the decline of passenger service on privately owned railroads in the 1950s and 1960s. In addition, Amtrak pays property taxes (through fees to host railroads) that highway users do not pay. Advocates have asserted that Amtrak should only be expected to be as self-sufficient as those competing modes of transit.Template:Citation needed

Along these lines, in a June 2008 interview with Reuters,[43] Amtrak President Alex Kummant made specific observations: $10 billion per year is transferred from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund; $2.7 billion is granted to the FAA; $8 billion goes to "security and life safety for cruise ships."[43] Kummant makes a comparison of public subsidies: "it's like $40 a passenger for Amtrak and $500 to $700 per automobile." Moreover, Amtrak provides all of its own security, while airport security is a separate federal subsidy. Kummant added: "Let's not even get into airport construction which is a miasma of state, federal and local tax breaks and tax refinancing and God knows what."[43]

The Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, which established Amtrak, specifically states that "The Corporation will not be an agency or establishment of the United States Government,"[138] common stock was issued in 1971 to railroads that contributed capital and equipment; these shares convey almost no benefits[139] but their current holders[140] declined a 2002 buy-out offer by Amtrak. There are currently 109,396,994 shares of preferred stock at a par value of $100 per share, all held by the US government. There are currently 9,385,694 shares of common stock with a par value of $10 per share held by four other railroad companies: APU (formerly Penn Central) 53%, BNSF (35%), Canadian Pacific (7%), and Canadian National (5%).[141]

Supporters of Amtrak and transit systems also point out that as the first decade of the 21st century came to a close, the user fees from the Highway Trust Fund did not cover the cost of maintaining the national highway system.Template:Citation needed Transportation advocacy groups such as the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials note that since 2008, the U.S. Congress has authorized transfers of money from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund to keep it solvent.[142] Transfers from the General Fund to the Highway Trust Fund include: $8 billion (FY 2008); $7 billion (FY 2009); and $19.5 billion (FY 2010).[142]

See alsoEdit

Template:Portal

Template:Colbegin Topics dealing with Amtrak

Rail companies of interest

Rail disasters

Other national railroads

Template:Colend

NotesEdit

  1. Script error
  2. Script error
  3. Template:Cite press release
  4. Script error
  5. Script error
  6. Script error
  7. Amtrak History and Archives. Accessed March 6, 2013.
  8. Script error
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 Template:Harvnb
  10. 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Template:Harvnb
  11. Script error
  12. Template:Harvnb
  13. Template:Cite book
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 14.4 Template:Cite journal
  15. 15.0 15.1 15.2 Slason Thompson, A Short History of American Railways, Books for Libraries Press: Freeport, NY (1925, reprinted 1971), p. 324–391, 405.
  16. Script error
  17. Script error
  18. Script error
  19. Template:Cite book
  20. Template:Cite journal
  21. Script error
  22. Shafer, Mike, supra at 125. Previously, individual states made those judgments, and the reform that came about with the Transportation Act of 1958 was intended to streamline the process.
  23. Script error
  24. Study: NYS rail property taxes harm employment in rail, manufacturing - Feb. 11, 2002. Bcnys.org (2002-02-11). Retrieved on 2013-07-23.
  25. Template:Welsh-Pullman
  26. 26.0 26.1 Template:Cite book
  27. Template:Harvnb
  28. Template:Cite journal
  29. Template:Cite journal
  30. Template:Cite journal
  31. Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act, Template:USPL, Template:USStat, Template:USC. February 5, 1976.
  32. U.S. Federal Railroad Administration, Washington, DC. "Northeast Corridor Main Line." Accessed November 15, 2011.
  33. Script error
  34. Script error
  35. 35.0 35.1 Template:Cite book
  36. Template:Harvnb
  37. Script error
  38. Template:Cite book
  39. Washington Post, March 18, 1998
  40. Template:Cite speech
  41. Script error
  42. Template:Cite speech
  43. 43.0 43.1 43.2 43.3 Script error
  44. Template:Cite journal
  45. Script error
  46. 46.0 46.1 Script error
  47. Script error
  48. 48.0 48.1 Template:Cite press release
  49. Script error
  50. Script error
  51. Script error
  52. Amtrak President and CEO Joe Boardman named Railroader of the Year. Railway Age. Retrieved on 2014-04-12.
  53. Script error
  54. Script error
  55. Template:Cite journal
  56. Template:Cite journal
  57. Script error
  58. Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997. 105th Cong., Senate Report 105-85 (September 24, 1997).
  59. Script error
  60. 60.0 60.1 60.2 Script error
  61. Amtrak National Facts. Accessed July 2, 2008. Amtrak's 2007 fiscal year ran from October 2006 to September 2007. Does not include Canada.
  62. 62.0 62.1 Figures are from 2008. Script error
  63. Except where noted, figures are from 2007. Script error
  64. Figures are from 2011. Script error
  65. 65.0 65.1 Figures from 2012. Script error; Script error
  66. Figures from 2001, latest available
  67. http://www.buses.org/files/2008ABAFoundationComparativeFuelCO2.pdf table 1.1, figures from 2005. Cf. http://docs.wri.org/wri_co2comm_2002_commuting_protected.xls, sheet 8, cell C33 (figures from 2002).
  68. respectively http://docs.wri.org/wri_co2comm_2002_commuting_protected.xls, sheet 8, cell C36 (figures from 2002); http://www.buses.org/files/2008ABAFoundationComparativeFuelCO2.pdf table 1.1, figures from 2007.
  69. Script error
  70. Script error
  71. Respectively http://lipasto.vtt.fi/yksikkopaastot/henkiloliikennee/raideliikennee/junat_henkiloe.htm, figures for 2007; http://www.lipasto.vtt.fi/yksikkopaastot/henkiloliikennee/tieliikennee/linja-autote/latiee.htm, figures for 2010.
  72. Based on the 2008 Finnish data at http://lipasto.vtt.fi/yksikkopaastot/henkiloliikennee/ilmaliikennee/ilmae.htm.
  73. Script error
  74. Script error
  75. Script error
  76. Script error
  77. Script error
  78. Script error
  79. 79.0 79.1 Script error
  80. Script errorTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  81. Script error
  82. Script error
  83. Template:Cite press release
  84. Template:Citation
  85. Script error
  86. Script error
  87. Script error
  88. Script error
  89. Script error
  90. Script error
  91. http://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/92/472/Amtrak-Midwest-Wi-Fi-ATK-13-154.pdf
  92. Script error
  93. Script error
  94. Script error
  95. Script error
  96. Template:Cite press release
  97. Template:Harvnb
  98. Script error
  99. Template:Cite journal
  100. Script error
  101. Script error
  102. Script error
  103. 103.0 103.1 Template:Cite press release
  104. Script error
  105. Template:Cite press release
  106. Template:Cite journal
  107. Script error
  108. Script error
  109. Script error
  110. Script error
  111. Script error
  112. Script error
  113. Script error
  114. Script error
  115. Script error
  116. Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997. 105th Cong. (January 7, 1997)
  117. Script error
  118. Script error
  119. 119.0 119.1 Script error
  120. Script error
  121. Phillips, Don. Railpax Rescue. in Journey to Amtrak; The year history rode the passenger train. Ed. Harold A. Edmonson. Milwaukee, WI: Kalmbach Pub. Co., pp. 8–11 (1972).
  122. $709 million of the 1981 aid package was for operations. The remainder was capital appropriations. Template:Harvnb
  123. National Railroad Passenger Corp. Statistical Appendix to Amtrak FY1995 Annual Report, 1995 Annual Report, p.1.
  124. National Railroad Passenger Corp. 1999 Annual Report, p.41.
  125. Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997. 105th Cong. (January 7, 1997). Congressional Budget Office. S. 738 Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act (July 22, 1997), in 104th Cong. Senate Report 105-85 (September 24, 1997).
  126. 126.0 126.1 Script error
  127. Script error
  128. Script error
  129. Script errorTemplate:Dead linkTemplate:Cbignore
  130. Script error
  131. Pg. 25, Amtrak FY13 Comprehensive Business Plan, http://www.amtrak.com/ccurl/338/576/AmtrakFY13%20Budget-Comprehensive-Business-Plan-w-appx.pdf
  132. 132.0 132.1 Template:Harvnb
  133. Script error
  134. Wicker, Tom. In the Nation; Young David's Tantrum. The New York Times, p.A31 (May 3, 1985)
  135. Frailey, Fred W. Can Amtrak Survive the Budget Cutters?, U.S. News & World Report, p.52 (April 13, 1981).
  136. Congress Should Link Amtrak's Generous Subsidy to Improved Performance, Ronald D. Utt PhD, Heritage.org September 20, 2007
  137. Script error
  138. Script error
  139. The Past and Future of U.S. Passenger Rail Service, sec. 4 n.21 (September 2003).
  140. Script error
  141. PDF: Cato.org
  142. 142.0 142.1 Script error

ReferencesEdit

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit

Template:Commons category Template:Wikivoyage Official Amtrak web sites

Unofficial Amtrak-related web sites

Template:Amtrak rollingstock Template:Amtrak routes Template:North America class I Template:Caltrain

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.